Each court session is accompanied by minutes. This process is included in the list of duties performed by the court. In the required document, the main information about the past proceedings is indicated: who are the parties to it, what arguments are given by each participant, what evidence did the witnesses give, whether they were confirmed, etc. In addition, at the end of the consideration of the process, the protocol court session on civil case information is entered regarding the rulings and decisions of the court. What else this document includes, what features of its compilation take place, and much more, we will learn from the material presented.
Minutes of a court session in a civil case - very important document, which has a direct impact on further proceedings following the first trial
Interaction with the protocol: how to get it after the end of the trial
The person who was officially the secretary of the court during the consideration of the civil case is responsible for the preparation of the protocol. The timing of the final bringing the paper to mind, however, may vary. The judge will notify all participants in the case about them as soon as the court session is over.
It would seem that for what the parties to the process may need the minutes of the meeting, if they were present at the consideration of the case throughout the entire time. Everything is very simple: in some cases, you need to familiarize yourself with the protocol in order to draw up a more accurate and detailed complaint to the decision rendered by the court in respect of all the same persons.
Therefore, it would be most expedient to receive exactly a copy of the document, and not to familiarize yourself with the protocol exclusively at the time of visiting the court, and make extracts from it, since:
- if you have an assistant lawyer, then it is better for him to show the original document, but in the process of writing out information, you can, simply due to ignorance of some legal terms and subtleties, seriously distort the information;
- this will be much faster and easier, because long rewriting, again, can make you distort the information presented in the document, simply out of a desire to finish this unpleasant procedure as quickly as possible.
Drawing up a protocol is the duty of the secretary, entrusted to his shoulders by law. How well he will perform his work will have an impact on the fate of each participant in the process under consideration.
To obtain a copy of the minutes of a court session in a civil case, you must contact the court that dealt with it. This should be done as quickly as possible, because when reading this document, you may be surprised to find inaccuracies. If you wish, point out these inaccuracies by making a remark to the person who composes them. official, it must be remembered that the time of submission of these is limited five days from the moment the paper was signed.
However, it is possible to restore the specified period if you prove that it was missed by good reasons. Good reasons can be things like:
- disease;
- forced departure (the compulsion of which, of course, is documented);
- other similar reasons, due to which the person could not "get" to the protocol, and make all the necessary corrections.
Application for issuance of a copy of the protocol
Of course, when we talk about some official phenomena, such as the protocol of a civil case and the process of obtaining it, we understand that all procedures associated with them must also be carried out in an official manner.
In the context of the process of obtaining a protocol, it means that a copy of our document can only be obtained by submitting a formal application in advance.
You don’t have to worry, you will be given a form that you will need to fill out, you don’t need to compose the text yourself and look for legal grounds. However, for your reference, we will present further in the table a description of the constituent parts of the desired document.
Table 1
| Part | Description |
|---|---|
| introductory | This part states that the plaintiff filed an application against the defendant with the aim of demanding something from him, and therefore a court session on this case took place on such and such a date. The introductory part is made in the form of a statement, as if you are telling the court about what happened. |
| Legislative grounds | Next, you need to provide a number of links to legislative acts, which will confirm your right to receive a copy of the protocol. These guidelines may refer to: |
| Request for a copy | In the final part of the application, you ask the court to provide you with the minutes of the court session for review on the basis of the above grounds, while using copiers (that is, photocopies). |
Why read the protocol, getting a copy of it
The protocol is important for several reasons.
- If you do not agree with the decision or ruling made by the court and wish to appeal them. It is almost impossible to file a complaint without a protocol, only in cases where you have a phenomenal memory.
- To make sure the data is correct. Circumstances for filling in the protocol used subsequently for many procedures may vary. Unfortunately, it often happens that the text of a document is incomplete, or some information is incorrectly reflected in it. In this situation, you will have to make comments, which will later also be attached to the case.
The protocol drawn up during the court session acts as the main document of a procedural nature, which must fully and correctly reflect data on:
- events that occurred during the trial;
- these indicators;
- members judicial trial X;
- evidence presented by the parties.
The Code of Civil Procedure of our country stipulates the obligatory keeping of records in the courts of first instance, and therefore, the data contained in it can serve as a basis for canceling an earlier decision.
Contents of the minutes of the court session
So, the protocol of the court session is an official document drawn up according to the rules, on the basis of which it is possible to cancel in the future a decision previously made by the court. Accordingly, the compilation of this paper for its most effective use must be carried out without fail according to a specific sequence. Consider this sequence further down the list.
The protocol is drawn up on paper, otherwise its execution and recording are not implied. The desired document reflects the full course of events during the trial, and all its nuances. It is not allowed during its compilation:
- shorten words;
- shorten sentences;
- allow allegorical turns.
All explanations that have taken place regarding any issue coming from the participating parties, witnesses, third parties, are recorded directly from the first person. At the same time, not only the story of these persons, but also all the information provided by them on judicial matters answers, as well as answers to questions from other participants in the proceedings.
Responsibility for the correct and complete preparation of the protocol, as well as its timely production, is divided among themselves:
- the presiding representative of the judiciary;
- secretary at the meeting.
Conclusion
The protocols drawn up during the trial in a civil case are in the nature of mandatory documents that must be kept during each of the court sessions. If an audio version is issued simultaneously with the written version, then subsequently it will need to be attached to the document of interest to us.
Issues related to family, land, labor, property law dealt with by various jurisdictional bodies. In most cases, they are under the jurisdiction of regional and global courts. The final stage of the proceedings is the decision of the court. In a civil case, such a decision is not much different from a criminal or arbitration one. But the execution order may differ. consider step by step order decision-making and an appeal procedure.
Video - Minutes of the court session
Judge of the *** district court of *** about B……. E.P.
under Secretary K…….. Yu.A.
Having considered in open court a civil case on the claim of I……… Oksana Mikhailovna to *** branch of VTB Bank 24, L………. Dmitry Yuryevich on the release of property from attachment and the exclusion of property from the inventory.
The court session is open at 14:30.
The presiding judge opens the court session and reports which case is to be considered.
The secretary reports on the appearance in court.
At the hearing were: Plaintiff's Representative – I……. A.S., representative of the defendant *** branch No. 5440 of VTB Bank 24 CJSC - Prokhorov M.V., third party OSP in the *** district of the city of ***o - S………. K.A.
The following did not appear at the hearing: plaintiff – I……… O.M. about the day and time duly notified, asked to consider the case in his absence, the defendant – L……… D.Yew. - duly notified of the day and time of the hearing of the case, did not inform about the reasons for not appearing in court.
The issue of the possibility of considering the case with this appearance of persons is discussed.
Participants in the process (general opinion): Possibly.
The court decided to consider the case at this appearance of persons.
Identities are set:
Plaintiff's Representative:
I…………. Alexey Sergeevich, 07/27/1982
birth, acts on the basis of a power of attorney
No. 1102 dated May 16, 2011
The representative of the defendant *** branch No. 5440 of Bank VTB 24 CJSC:
P……….. Maxim Vasilievich, by proxy
No. 386 dated 01.02.2011
Third party OSB in the ***sky district of the city of ***o:
FROM……. Kristina Alexandrovna, judicial
bailiff of the Judicial Department
bailiffs in the *** district of the city of ***o
The composition of the court has been announced, secretary.
Right of withdrawal clarified. There are no withdrawals.
The procedural rights provided for by Art. 35, 39 Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation.
The rights are clear. There are no requests.
The court proceeds to consider the case on the merits.
The claim is announced.
The representative of the plaintiff: I insist on the claim. I am clarifying claim, I ask you to transfer the seized vehicle because she is in her sixth month of pregnancy and is therefore undergoing medical examinations, takes tests, and if you have one child and do not have your own car, this is very difficult.
The representative of the plaintiff explained to the court:
27.01.2011 for execution to the bailiff to the executor of the bailiff department for the ***sky district of the city of ***o C………….. K.A. entered executive document Writ of execution No. 2-1410/09 dated 31.03.09 issued by the Meshchansky District Court of Moscow, the subject of execution: foreclose on property against the debtor: L……… Dmitry Yuryevich in favor of the claimant *** cue branch №5440 VTB Bank 24 CJSC, in connection with which the bailiff 28.01.2011g. a Resolution was issued on the initiation of enforcement proceedings No. 3513/11/07/42 in relation to the debtor L…….. Dmitry Yuryevich.
23.03.2011 the bailiff performed the following actions: The act of seizure (inventory of property) and the seizure of the vehicle was carried out - the act of seizure of the arrested property, at the address: ***o, Komsomolsky Ave., 65, according to which the vehicle belonging to the plaintiff: car Hyundai NF 2/0 GLS AT 2007 released and taken away in an unknown direction.
Also, the bailiff seized the traffic police of the OGTO and RTS for KO in relation to the specified vehicle, on the prohibition of committing registration actions with the plaintiff's car she was not aware of. Actions bailiff the plaintiff considers the performer illegal, since the specified car belongs to her on the right of ownership, she bought it on the basis of a sales contract dated 20.08.2010. put the specified car on the account in the traffic police after the purchase. She is a conscientious buyer. And she does not know anything about the court decision on the basis of which the specified car was seized from her.
Based on common principles and meaning civil law(an analogy of law) and the requirements of good faith, reasonableness and fairness (paragraph 2 of Article 6 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation), paragraph 25 of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation dated February 17, 2011. 10 “On Certain Issues of the Application of Legislation on Pledge” clarifies that “the pledged movable property purchased from the pledgor for compensation by a person who did not and should not have known that the property he was acquiring is the subject of pledge cannot be levied” . At the same time, the courts must assess the circumstances of the acquisition of the pledged property, on the basis of which the buyer should have assumed that he was acquiring the pledged property. In particular, the courts must establish whether the original copy of the document evidencing the seller's right to the property being sold (for example, a vehicle passport) or its duplicate was handed over to the purchaser; whether there were signs of pledge on the pledged property at the time of its transfer to the acquirer.
To the questions of the court, the representative of the plaintiff:
— Yanshina O.M. in the case of termination of the loan agreement and the recovery of debt under the loan agreement as a third party was not involved.
— The decision has entered into force.
No questions.
The defendant's representative explained to the court:
I object to the satisfaction of the stated requirements, because according to the decision of the Meshchansky District Court of Moscow on 26.02.2009. on the suit of VTB 24 bank against Lepilov D.Yu. loan agreement dated 13.09.2007. was terminated, it was decided to recover from Lepilov a debt under a loan agreement of 2,411,701.97 rubles, and foreclosure was levied on a 2007 Hyundai NF 2.0 GLS car. release identification number The specified car was found at gr. I……….., and through the writ of execution the car was legally seized from I………..
No questions.
The third person explained to the court:
I object to the satisfaction of the stated requirements, since my actions are legal and justified. I aroused enforcement proceedings based writ of execution court and seized the vehicle and assigned it to a special parking lot in ***sky district ***o at the location of the car.
No questions.
The court proceeds to examine the written materials of the case.
Announced:
l.d. 13-14 - act of seizure of arrested property
l.d. 15-16 - act of arrest
l.d. 17 - decision to initiate enforcement proceedings
l.d. 18 - writ of execution
l.d. 19 - contract of sale
l.d. 20- vehicle passport
l.d. 25 - petition
l.d. 26 - help
l.d. 33-38 - the decision of the Meshchansky district settlement of February 26, 2009.
l.d. 39-43 - response to a request from the UGIBDD for KO
l.d. 44 - statement
l.d. 46 - fetch on request
l.d. 56 - statement
l.d. 57, 58 - the act of non-residence of the defendant
The examination of the written materials of the case has been completed.
There are no remarks or additions to the published materials of the case.
The court proceeds to judicial debate.
In debate:
The representative of the plaintiff: I insist on the claim.
Representative of the defendant: I do not recognize the claim.
Third person: I do not support the claim.
Debates are over. There are no replicas.
The court retires to the deliberation room.
Upon leaving the deliberation room, the operative part of the decision was announced.
The term for the production of a reasoned court decision is explained. The term and procedure for its appeal to the regional court, as well as the right to familiarize with the protocol of the court session and bring comments and additions to it, are explained.
The court session closed at 15:10.
Registration of the minutes of the court session in civil cases
Minutes of the court sessionis the main procedural document, which should reflect all the data about what happened during the trial. It also contains the necessary information about the evidence on the basis of which the court decided the decision on the case.
The Code of Civil Procedure establishes the obligatory keeping of protocols in the courts of first instance. Therefore, the absence of a protocol serves as a basis for the annulment of the court decision.
The minutes of the court session must include:
1.year, month, date and place of the court session;
2.the start and end time of the court session;
3.the name of the court hearing the case, the composition of the court and the secretary
4.court session;
5.name of the case;
6.information about the appearance of persons participating in the case, representatives, witnesses, experts, translators;
7.information on the explanation to the persons participating in the case and their representatives procedural rights and responsibilities;
8.orders of the presiding judge and rulings issued by the court without being removed to the deliberation room;
9.statements of persons participating in the case and representatives;
10.explanations of persons participating in the case and representatives, testimonies of witnesses, oral explanations by experts of their conclusions, data from the examination of material and written evidence;
11.conclusions of government bodies and the opinion of public organizations and labor collectives;
13.information about the announcement of definitions and decisions;
14.information on the explanation of the content of the decision, the procedure and term for appealing it.
The protocol is drawn up on paper (recording on magnetic and other media is not provided for by the existing law) and reflects the entire course of the court session. Abbreviations of words, sentences, turns are not allowed. Explanations of the parties, third parties, witnesses, experts are recorded in the first person. Not only their free story is recorded, but also the answers to the questions posed by the judges and other participants in the trial.
All objections of the participants in the trial against the actions of the presiding judge shall be recorded in the minutes. All statements of the participants in the trial, as well as everything that they ask to be included in the minutes, must be entered in the minutes.
Responsibility for the correctness, completeness and timeliness of the preparation of the minutes shall be borne by the presiding judge and the secretary of the court session.
The Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation has repeatedly pointed out that the presiding judge in the court session is personally responsible for the completeness, accuracy, technical good quality of the protocol of the court session, that he is obliged in each case to ensure that the protocol is kept by a person prepared for this, to monitor during the process the completeness and accuracy of the record in the protocol of all explanations and testimonies of interrogated persons, check and correct the protocol in time, prevent such maintenance and technical implementation of the protocol, in which its subsequent reading and use is impossible or difficult, and certify the protocol with your signature after carefully checking its correctness, accuracy and good quality.
The minutes of the court session must be prepared and signed not later than the next day after the end of the court session.
Establishing a deadline for the production and signing of the protocol of the court session is important for the timely submission of comments on the protocol and the appeal of the court decision by the participants in the trial.
Having established that the protocol does not accurately set out or does not reflect everything that happened in the court session, the persons participating in the case and representatives may apply for a change or addition to the protocol.
The parties, applicants, interested persons, the prosecutor, representatives have the right to submit comments on the minutes of the court session. They can submit comments on the entire protocol, on any part of it, and not just on the one that concerns their interests in the case under consideration.
Comments on the minutes are submitted exclusively to writing.
The term for bringing comments to the protocol of the court session may be restored by the court if it is recognized that it was missed for a good reason. For example, if the procedure for familiarization with the protocol was not explained to the persons participating in the case and representatives, then the conclusion cannot be recognized as justified, judging that the deadline was missed without good reason.
In cases where the chairman agrees with the remarks, he certifies their correctness by his resolution. It is not necessary to make an appropriate determination.
The law obliges the presiding judge (court) to consider comments on the protocol within five days from the date of their submission.
1.1 Drawing up a protocol
Protocols are drawn up by the secretary in the court session itself or when a separate procedural action is performed outside the session.
The persons participating in the case and representatives have the right to petition for the entry into the minutes of the circumstances that they consider essential to them in the case.
The protocol must be prepared and signed no later than the next day after the end of the court session or the performance of a separate procedural action.
The minutes are signed by the chairman and the secretary. All changes, amendments, additions must be specified in the protocol.
The duty to draw up the protocol is assigned to the secretary of the court session. The protocol is kept in the language of the court proceedings. It can be written by hand or typed. The issue of using audio and video recordings for the sake of completeness of information has been resolved positively in practice.
The requirement for literacy in the preparation of the protocol refers not only to the observance of the rules of spelling and syntax, it must be consistent in terms of the style of presentation and legal terminology.
Explanations of the parties, third parties, other persons participating in the case, testimony of witnesses, experts are recorded in the first person. The same applies to the statements and petitions made. When posing a question, the person who asked it and the content of the question are indicated; after which the answer is fixed. The orders of the presiding officer are reflected in the protocol on his behalf in the third person, and the rulings are reflected on behalf of the court, while the content of the ruling, issued without removal to the deliberation room, is formulated and dictated for the protocol by the presiding officer.
When compiling a protocol, corrections, additions between lines, erasures, shortening of words, strikethroughs, inserts, etc. should be avoided. If the need for this arose, then all amendments, additions, changes must be stipulated in the protocol itself. Depending on the nature of the correction, there are three types of reservations: " corrected (word, number...) believe", "written or inscribed", "believe", "crossed out"..."do not read". Reservations are made in the final part of the protocol, indicating the pages to which they refer. Reservations certified by the signatures of the secretary of the court session and the chairperson.
The presiding judge is responsible for the full and objective reflection in the minutes of the entire course of the trial. In order to ensure the required good quality of the protocol, he must ensure that persons prepared to perform the duties of a secretary of the court session are allowed to keep the protocol, during the trial, observe the completeness and accuracy of the reflection of the content of the procedural actions and the results of the examination of evidence, check and correct the produced in the recording protocol, to prevent the drawing up of a careless, illiterate, technically poor-quality procedural document.
The law indicates a short time for the preparation of the protocol. It must be drawn up no later than the next day after the end of the court session or the performance of a separate procedural action. This also applies to cases where the court postpones the preparation of the reasoning part of the decision.
The law gives the court the right (for reasons of special complexity of the case, for example, if there are several plaintiffs or defendants in the case, or the amount of evidence examined is large) to postpone for a period of not more than three days. We are talking about calendar days. The countdown of the mentioned period starts from the next (after the announcement of the decision) day. However, even in the mentioned situation, the law imperatively prescribes to the court:
1.set out the operative part of the decision in writing, sign it by all judges;
2.to announce the operative part at the same court session in which the trial of the case ended;
3.announce when the persons participating in the case and representatives will be able to get acquainted with the full content of the reasoned decision. This is indicated in the minutes of the court session.
4.attach to the case the announced resolutive part of the decision.
The protocol is considered to be made after its signing by the presiding judge and the secretary of the court session. Before signing the protocol, the chairperson is obliged to carefully read its contents and invite the secretary to make the necessary corrections or additions to the text.
The absence of a signature in the protocol deprives it of its strength and significance as a judicial document, leads to its invalidity, which entails the same consequences as the absence of the protocol. The decision of the court of first instance is subject to cancellation.
Often, the untimely preparation of the protocol is due to the length and thoroughness of the work on it, in particular, in cases that are of particular difficulty in their resolution.
1.2 Notes on the protocol
The persons participating in the case and representatives have the right to get acquainted with the protocol and, within three days from the date of its signing, may submit written comments on the protocol indicating the incorrectness and incompleteness admitted in it.
When familiarizing themselves with the protocol of the court session, the persons participating in the case and representatives may have an opinion that the protocol does not accurately and incompletely reflect everything that happened at the court session. Most often, this concerns the explanations of the parties, third parties, records of witnesses' testimonies, the content of questions and answers, petitions and statements. The statements of the listed persons on making additions and changes to the protocol are referred to as comments on the protocol. Comments must be in writing. On the one hand, they reproduce the record that incorrectly or incompletely reflects what happened during the court session, and on the other hand, it is indicated which record, in the opinion of the applicant, is true, and contains a request to eliminate the inaccuracies and make the necessary additions.
Comments can be submitted both on the entire protocol and on its separate parts within three days from the date of its signing. In order for comments on the minutes to be submitted in a timely manner, the presiding officer is obliged to explain to the persons participating in the case and their representatives their right to get acquainted with the minutes of the court session and bring comments to it within the time period stipulated by law. This is done in compliance with the requirements of Art. 155 Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, as well as after the announcement of the decision, clarification of its content, procedure and terms of appeal. The term for bringing comments to the minutes of the court session may be restored by the court if there is a good reason.
The court may recognize as valid reasons any life circumstances that prevented a person from performing procedural actions in deadlines. In this case, it is necessary to proceed from a specific situation (a person’s illness, the need to care for a sick family member, a long business trip, etc.).
Assistant referee: Petrova K.A.
02.01.2019
Why do I need to make an application for issuing a copy of the minutes of the court session? What are the features of its preparation and submission to the court? Where can I get a sample application, how to fill it out and submit it to the court? Let's figure it out.
Minutes of the court session
At each court session, a protocol is kept, this is the duty of the court (). The minutes indicate the basic information about the court session: who participates in the process, what explanations he gives, the testimony of witnesses is recorded, the study of the evidence presented, the text of the judicial debate. The protocol contains court rulings issued without removal to the deliberation room, indicates when a reasoned decision will be drawn up.
The protocol is prepared by the secretary of the court session within three days after the court session in a civil case. The terms of production are reported by the judge following the results of the court session.
Familiarization with the minutes of the court session will allow you to more accurately and in detail draw up a complaint against court order, or prepare for consideration of another case in court, with the participation of the same persons. It is much more convenient to use your copy of the document than to get acquainted with the protocol in court, to make extracts from it.
How is an application for a copy of the protocol drawn up?
To obtain a copy of the minutes of the court session, it is enough to write an application to the court that considered the civil case. If there are, it should be remembered that the deadline for their submission is limited to five days after signing. This one for good reason.
To obtain a copy of the minutes of the court session, you can make an application using the form below. It is not necessary to adhere to a strictly defined form, however, compliance general rules filing applications to the court, most likely, can allow faster results.
In the text of the application for issuing a protocol, you must indicate the date of the court session and the name of the civil case, it is advisable to indicate the name of the judge and the number of the case so that the application reaches the judge faster and there are no errors.
Submission and consideration of an application for a copy of the protocol
The application is submitted through the office of the court. You can apply immediately after the end of the trial. However, there is no time limit for submitting an application. you can request a copy of the protocol from an already completed civil case.
It is allowed to file an application for issuing a copy of the protocol at the court session, at the stage of resolving the petitions of persons by the court. involved in the case.
The application is considered by the judge without holding a separate court session. If the application was received through the office. then it is not simply put a resolution on the issuance of a copy of the protocol after its production. If the statement was made at the court session, the court will issue a ruling in the protocol form.
It should be noted that the courts do not always issue copies of the protocol, referring to the Instructions for Paperwork. Formally, the courts are right, in regulations there is no indication of an unconditional obligation to issue copies of the minutes. In this case, we recommend that you sue.
Sample application for issuing a copy of the protocol
IN _________________________
(name of court)
From ____________________________
(full name, address)
in civil case No. _______
on the claim ___________ (name of the plaintiff)
to ____________ (full name of the defendant)
Application for issuance of a copy of the protocol
"___" _________ ____, the court held a court session, during which a protocol was kept.
I need to get a copy of the protocol for _________ (state the reasons for obtaining a copy, for example, to familiarize myself with its contents).
Based on the foregoing, guided by paragraph 7.12 of the “Instructions for judicial office work in district court”, approved by order of the Judicial Department under Supreme Court RF dated April 29, 2003 No. 36,
Ask:
Issue a copy of the minutes of the court session dated "___" _________ ____ in civil case No. ______ on the claim _________ (name of the plaintiff) to _________ (name of the defendant).
Date of application "___" _________ ____ Signature _______
Download sample application:
Questions on drawing up an application for issuing a copy of the protocol
How long does it take for the court to issue a copy of the minutes of the court session?
Copies procedural documents from civil cases are issued by the court on the day of receipt of the application.
Can the court refuse to give me a copy of the minutes of the court session in a civil case?
The court may propose, instead of issuing a copy of the protocol, to familiarize itself with the materials of the civil case and make copies of them at its own expense. In this case, you can use a scanner or camera to make a copy of the protocol, or make extracts from the protocol by hand.
Article 259
1. A protocol is kept during each court session. During the court session of the courts of the first and appellate instances, a protocol is drawn up in writing and protocols are kept using audio recording means (audio recording). When considering a criminal case in a closed court session in the cases provided for by Article 241 of this Code, the use of audio recording means is not allowed.
2. The protocol may be written by hand, typed or computer generated. To ensure the completeness of the protocol during its maintenance, shorthand and technical means can be used.
3. The following must be indicated in the minutes of the court session:
1) the place and date of the meeting, the time of its beginning and end;
2) what criminal case is being considered;
3) the name and composition of the court, data on the assistant judge, secretary, translator, prosecutor, defense counsel, defendant, as well as on the victim, civil plaintiff, civil defendant, their representatives and other persons summoned to court;
4) data on the identity of the defendant and on the measure of restraint chosen for him;
5) actions of the court in the order in which they took place during the court session;
6) statements, objections and petitions of the persons participating in the criminal case;
7) rulings or rulings issued by the court without being removed to the deliberation room;
8) rulings or resolutions issued by the court with removal to the deliberation room;
9) information on explaining to participants in criminal proceedings their rights, duties and responsibilities;
10) detailed content of the testimony;
11) questions asked by the interrogated and their answers;
12) the results of inspections and other actions taken in the court session to examine evidence;
13) the circumstances that the participants in the criminal proceedings ask to be recorded in the record;
14) the main content of the speeches of the parties in the judicial debate and the last word of the defendant;
15) information about the announcement of the verdict and about the explanation of the procedure for familiarization with the protocol of the court session and making comments on it;
16) information about the explanation justified and convict order and the term for appealing the verdict, as well as an explanation of the right to petition for participation in the consideration of the criminal case by the court of appeal.
4. The protocol also indicates the measures of influence taken against the person who violated the order in the court session.
5. If photographing, audio and (or) video recording, filming of interrogations, broadcasting on radio, television or in the information and telecommunications network "Internet" was carried out during the trial, then a note about this is made in the minutes of the court session. In this case, photographic materials, audio and (or) video recordings, filming shall be attached to the materials of the criminal case. When broadcasting a court session, the minutes of the court session also indicate the name of the mass media or the site in the information and telecommunications network "Internet" through which the broadcast was carried out.
6. The protocol must be prepared and signed within 3 days from the date of the end of the court session by the presiding judge and the secretary of the court session, and if the presiding officer entrusted the assistant judge with keeping the protocol, by the presiding judge and the assistant judge. The protocol during the court session may be prepared in parts, which, like the protocol as a whole, are signed by the presiding judge and the secretary, and if the presiding officer entrusted the assistant judge with keeping the protocol, by the presiding judge and the assistant judge. At the request of the parties, they may be given the opportunity to familiarize themselves with the parts of the protocol as they are prepared.
7. An application for familiarization with the protocol and audio recording of the court session shall be submitted by the parties in writing within 3 days from the date of the end of the court session. The specified period may be restored if the application was not filed for valid reasons. The petition is not subject to satisfaction if the criminal case has already been sent to appellate instance or after the expiration of the period provided for an appeal, is in the process of execution. The presiding judge provides the parties with the opportunity to familiarize themselves with the protocol and audio recording of the court session within 3 days from the date of receipt of the petition. The presiding judge has the right to provide other participants in the trial with the opportunity to familiarize themselves with the protocol, audio recording at their request and in the part related to their testimony. If the minutes of the court session, due to objective circumstances, are made after 3 days from the date of the end of the court session, then the participants in the trial who filed petitions must be notified of the date of signing the protocol and the time when they can familiarize themselves with it. The time for familiarization with the protocol and audio recording of the court session is set by the presiding judge, depending on the volume of the specified protocol and audio recording, but cannot be less than 5 days from the moment the familiarization begins. In exceptional cases, the presiding judge may, at the request of the person who examines the protocol and the audio recording, extend the set time. If a participant in the trial obviously delays the time of familiarization with the protocol and audio recording, the presiding judge has the right to set a certain period for familiarization with them by his decision.