Judgment May 30, 2017

In case No. 12-76 / 2017

Accepted Sergach District Court (Nizhny Novgorod Region)

1. Judge Sergachsky district court Nizhny Novgorod region Gusev S.A.,
2. Having considered the complaint of the Office of the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation (UPF) in the Sergach district of the Nizhny Novgorod region against the ruling of the magistrate judicial area No. 2 of the Sergachsky judicial district of the Nizhny Novgorod region dated 04/27/2017. in case No. 5-155 / 2017,

3. Installed:

4. 04/27/2017 the magistrate of the judicial district No. 2 of the Sergach judicial district of the Nizhny Novgorod region issued a decision in the case of administrative offense in relation to Koroleva M.N. According to this resolution, the proceedings in the case initiated under Article 15.33.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation were terminated on the grounds provided for in Article 24.5 - the absence of an administrative offense event.
5. 05/10/2017 The UPFR for the Sergach District of the Nizhny Novgorod Region appealed to the Sergach District Court with a complaint against the said decision.
6. A copy of the decision of the magistrate of 04/27/2017. received by the applicant on April 28, 2017. The deadline for filing a complaint with the court has not been violated.
7. The representative of the UPF RF for the Sergach district of the Nizhny Novgorod region did not appear at the hearing. Properly notified. The reason for the failure to appear is unknown.
8. As follows from the complaint, the UPF RF for the Sergach district of the Nizhny Novgorod region does not agree with the ruling by virtue of the following.
9. The absence of an event of an administrative offense should be expressed in the absence of a real fact of the person committing an act for which the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation provides for liability. Meanwhile, the event of an administrative offense in the dispute under consideration takes place.
10. The materials of the case confirm the fact that M.N. actions in the form of failure to submit, within the period established by the legislation on individual (personified) accounting in the compulsory pension insurance system, the information necessary for maintaining individual (personified) accounting, for which Article 15.33.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation provides for liability in the form of a fine.
11. Information on form SZV-M for August 2016 for 3 insured persons were represented only on March 21, 2017, instead of the period established by law - no later than September 10, 2016.
12. The conclusion of the court that the decision in the case of an administrative offense is subject to termination due to the absence of an event of an administrative offense, since for August-September 2016. administrative responsibility under Art. 15.33.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation was absent, is erroneous. At the time of consideration of the materials of this administrative offense, Art. 15.33.2 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation, which provides for administrative responsibility for this offense.
13. In fact, reporting for August 2016 was presented by M.N. Koroleva - 03/21/2017. Thus, an administrative offense, the responsibility for which is established by Art. 15.33.2 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation, was committed by T.K. Lapshina. 03/21/2017, that is, during the period of validity of Art. 15.33.2 Administrative Code of the Russian Federation. At the same time, the deadline - 09/10/2016, established for reporting, should be used in order to calculate the statute of limitations for attracting administrative responsibility... On 03/21/2017 the limitation period for bringing to administrative responsibility, established by Part 1 of Art. 4.5. Administrative Code of the Russian Federation (one year) - not expired. Koroleva M.N. is subject to administrative liability.
14. The UPF for the Sergachsky district of the Nizhny Novgorod region asks for the decision of the magistrate of the judicial district No. 2 of the Sergachsky judicial district of the Nizhny Novgorod region of 04/27/2017. cancel, return the case for a new examination.
15. The person in respect of whom the proceedings on the case of an administrative offense - Koroleva M.N. - are being conducted, did not appear at the hearing. Properly notified.
16. Having studied the materials of the case, I believe that the complaint of the UPF RF on the Sergachsky district of the Nizhny Novgorod region is not subject to satisfaction.
17. In accordance with part 2 of article 54 of the Constitution Russian Federation, no one can be held responsible for an act that at the time of its commission was not recognized as an offense.
18. In accordance with paragraph 1 of Art. 1.7 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation, a person who has committed an administrative offense is subject to liability on the basis of the law in force at the time of the commission of an administrative offense.
19. A law that mitigates or abolishes administrative liability for an administrative offense or otherwise improves the situation of a person who has committed an administrative offense has retroactive effect, that is, it applies to a person who committed an administrative offense before the entry into force of such a law and in respect of whom the decision on the appointment of an administrative offense. the punishment was not executed.
20. A law establishing or aggravating administrative responsibility for an administrative offense or otherwise aggravating the situation of a person is not retroactive.
21. Federal law from 03.07.2016 N 250-FZ in the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, from 01 January 2017. Article 15.33.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation was introduced, which provides for administrative liability for failure to submit within the period established by the legislation of the Russian Federation on individual (personified) accounting in the compulsory pension insurance system or refusal to submit to the authorities The Pension Fund Of the Russian Federation issued in established order information (documents) necessary for maintaining individual (personified) accounting in the compulsory pension insurance system, as well as providing such information in an incomplete volume or in a distorted form.
22. According to clause 2.2 of article 11 of the Federal Law of 01.04. No. 27-FZ "On individual (personified) accounting in the compulsory pension insurance system", in the version in effect at the time of the legal relationship under consideration, the policyholder, every month, no later than the 10th day of the month following the reporting period - a month, presents about each employee who works for him the insured person, the information provided for by the law.
23. Thus, Koroleva M.N. had to submit to the UPF for the Sergach district information for August 2016 - until 09/10/2016. and the date of commission of M.N. offenses should be considered 11 September 2016.
24. As follows from the materials of the administrative case, M.N. submitted to the UPF RF for the Sergach District reporting on the SZV-M form for August 2016 - March 21, 2017.
25. At the time when Koroleva M.N. was supposed to submit to the Pension Fund the information necessary for maintaining individual (personified) accounting in the compulsory pension insurance system for August 2016, there was no administrative responsibility for failure to provide such information.
26. Thus, the provisions of Article 15.33.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, for the qualification of actions (inaction) by Koroleva M.N., cannot be applied.
27. According to clause 1 of part 1 of Art. 24.5 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, proceedings in a case of an administrative offense cannot be started, and started proceedings are subject to termination in the absence of an event of an administrative offense.
28. Based on the foregoing and guided by paragraph 1 of Part 1 of Art. 30.7 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation,

Case No. 5-4333 / 2018

P O S T A N O V L E N I E

The magistrate of the judicial district No. 74 in the Pervomaisky judicial region in the city of Omsk Zakharova N.Yu., having considered the case of an administrative offense, provided for by Art. 15.33.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation in relation to

Sementsova V.P.,

U S T A N O V I L:

On May 24, 2018, it was established that the director of xxx V.P. Sementsov in the GU - PFR Department in the CAO of Omsk on October 18, 2017, the monthly reporting in the form "Information on insured persons" (form SZV-M) for September 2017 was not submitted in time. The deadline for submitting the report for September 2017 is no later than 16.10 .2017 year.

Sementsov V.P. v court session did not participate, was notified of the place and time of the consideration of the case in a proper manner. He presented to the court a statement on the consideration of the case in his absence, asked to take into account when sentencing that the offense was committed unintentionally, admission of guilt, insignificance of delay (2 working days), and was brought to administrative responsibility for the first time. When imposing a sentence, he asked to set the amount of the fine less than the minimum amount provided for by Art. 15.33.2 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation, or replace the fine with a punishment in the form of a verbal warning.

Having examined the materials of the case, the court comes to the following.

According to clause 2.2 of Article 11 of the Federal Law of 01.04.1996 No. 27-FZ of the Federal Law of April 1, 1996. No. 27-FZ "On individual (personified) accounting in the compulsory pension insurance system", the policyholder, on a monthly basis, no later than the 15th day of the month following the reporting period - a month, submits about each insured person working for him (including persons who have entered into civil - of a legal nature, the subject of which is the performance of work, the provision of services, contracts for the author's order, contracts of alienation exclusive right for works of science, literature, art, publishing license agreements, license agreements on the granting of the right to use a work of science, literature, art, including agreements on the transfer of powers to manage rights, concluded with an organization for the management of rights on a collective basis) the following information:

33.2 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation in the list established by Part 2 of Art. 4.1.1 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation, not included.

By virtue of Part 2 of Art. 3.4 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, a warning is established for the first time committed administrative offenses in the absence of harm or the emergence of a threat of harm to the life and health of people, objects of the animal and plant world, environment, objects of cultural heritage (monuments of history and culture) of the peoples of the Russian Federation, state security, the threat of natural and technogenic character, as well as in the absence of property damage.

In accordance with clause 1 of part 2 of the Federal Law of December 26, 2008 No. 294-FZ "On the Protection of the Rights of Legal Entities and Individual Entrepreneurs in the Exercise of State Control (Supervision) and municipal control»Under the state control (supervision) is understood the activities of the authorized bodies of state power ( federal bodies executive power and executive authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation), aimed at preventing, detecting and suppressing violations by legal entities, their heads and other officials, individual entrepreneurs, their authorized representatives of the requirements established by this Federal Law, other federal laws and other laws adopted in accordance with them regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation, laws and other regulatory legal acts of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, by organizing and conducting inspections of legal entities, individual entrepreneurs, organizing and carrying out measures to prevent violations of mandatory requirements, control measures carried out without interaction with legal entities, individual entrepreneurs , the adoption of measures envisaged by the legislation of the Russian Federation to suppress and (or) eliminate the consequences of the violations identified, as well as the activities of the specified designated bodies state power on systematic monitoring of performance mandatory requirements, analysis and forecasting of the state of fulfillment of mandatory requirements in the implementation of activities by legal entities, individual entrepreneurs.

The offense provided for in Article 15.33.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation was revealed during the implementation of state control for the timeliness and reliability of the information provided by the insured to the State Institution - the Office of the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation, that is, as a result of control measures carried out without interaction with the legal entity.

According to the Federal Tax Service of Russia, posted on the Internet at www.nalog.ru, xxx is included in Single register small and medium-sized businesses is a small business.

Data that Sementsov V.P. previously brought to administrative responsibility, the case materials do not contain.

Perfect by V.P. Sementsov the administrative offense did not entail harm or the emergence of a threat of harm to the life and health of people or other negative consequences.

Taking into account that xxx is a small business entity, the head is V.P. Sementsov. for committing this administrative offense, he is brought to administrative responsibility for the first time, and also, taking into account that the commission of this administrative offense did not entail harm or threat of harm to life and health of people or other possible consequences, the court concludes that there are grounds for replacement of an administrative penalty, sanctioned article 15.33.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, on warning.

Guided by Articles 29.9, 29.10 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation,

P O S T A N O V I L:

To recognize Sementsov V.P. guilty of committing an administrative offense under Article 15.33.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, and assign him administrative penalty as a warning.

The decision can be appealed to the Pervomaisky District Court of Omsk by filing a complaint with a magistrate within 10 days from the date of delivery or receipt of a copy of the decision.

Justice of the Peace: N.Yu. Zakharova

The decision did not come into legal force.

Decision of 04 April 2018

In case No. 12-327 / 2018

Accepted Soviet District Court of Ufa (Republic of Bashkortostan)

1. Decision on administrative case- first revision
2. Information on the case
3. №12-327/2018
4. SOLUTION
5. April 4, 2018 Ufa
6. Judge of the Soviet District Court of Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan, Abuzarova E.R.,
7. Having considered the complaint of the State Administration - the Office of the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation in the Sovetsky district of Ufa RB against the decision of the magistrate of the court plot No. 2 in the Sovetsky district of the city of Ufa of the Republic of Bashkortostan dated January 30, 2018 on the termination of proceedings in the case of an administrative offense provided for in Article 15.33. 2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation in relation to individual entrepreneur Andrey Kuznetsov,

8. Installed:

9. By the decision of the magistrate of the judicial district No. 2 in the Sovetsky district of Ufa dated 01/30/2018, the proceedings in the case of an administrative offense provided for in Article 15.33.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation in relation to the individual entrepreneur Kuznetsov Andrey Vladimirovich were terminated due to the expiration of the term the limitation period of bringing to administrative responsibility.
10. Disagreeing with this resolution, the State Administration - the Office of the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation in the Sovetsky district of Ufa RB, in accordance with Articles 30.1-30.3 of the Administrative Offenses Code of the Russian Federation, filed a complaint in which it asks to cancel the resolution and send the case for a new examination. In support of the arguments, the applicant points out that the information on form SZV-M were provided by the individual entrepreneur Andrey Vladimirovich Kuznetsov, instead of the statutory deadline until, and in this situation, the limitation period for bringing to administrative responsibility begins to be calculated from the date of the discovery of the administrative offense.
11. The representative of the State Administration - the Office of the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation in the Sovetsky district of the city of Ufa RB, IE Kuznetsov Andrey Vladimirovich did not appear at the hearing, were duly notified, the reason for the failure to appear is not known to the court.
12. Under these circumstances, the court considers it possible to hold a hearing in the absence of the properly notified persons who did not appear.
13. Having studied and evaluated the materials of the case, the court comes to the following.
14. Article 24.1 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation establishes that the objectives of the proceedings in the case of an administrative offense are a comprehensive, complete, objective and timely clarification of the circumstances of each case, and its resolution in accordance with the law.
15. In accordance with article 15.33.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, failure to submit, within the period established by the legislation of the Russian Federation on individual (personified) accounting in the system of compulsory pension insurance, or refusal to submit to the bodies of the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation the information (documents) drawn up in accordance with the established procedure, necessary for maintaining an individual (personified) accounting in the compulsory pension insurance system, as well as the presentation of such information in an incomplete volume or in a distorted form entails the imposition of administrative fine for officials in the amount of three hundred to five hundred rubles.
16. According to clause 2.2 of Article 11 of Federal Law No. 27-FZ of 01.04.1996 "On individual (personified) accounting in the compulsory pension insurance system" he has an insured person (including persons who have entered into contracts of a civil law nature, the subject of which is the performance of work, the provision of services, contracts for the author's order, contracts for the alienation of the exclusive right to works of science, literature, art, publishing license contracts, license contracts for the provision of rights use of a work of science, literature, art, including agreements on the transfer of powers for the management of rights, concluded with an organization for the management of rights on a collective basis) the following information:
17. 1) insurance number of an individual personal account;
18. 2) surname, name and patronymic;
19. 3) taxpayer identification number (if the policyholder has data on the taxpayer identification number of the insured person).
20. Thus, the individual entrepreneur Andrey Vladimirovich Kuznetsov was obliged to provide information about the insured persons for the years before, but this obligation was fulfilled by him. and additionally.
21. Part 1 of Article 4.5 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation establishes that a decision in a case of an administrative offense provided for in Article 15.33.2 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses cannot be issued after one year from the date of the administrative offense.
22. Based on paragraph 14 of the Resolution of the Plenum The Supreme Court RF of March 24, 2005 No. 5 "On some issues arising from the courts when applying the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses", the limitation period for bringing to responsibility is calculated according to general rules calculation of terms - from the day following the day of committing an administrative offense (after the day the offense was discovered). In the event of an administrative offense, expressed in the form of inaction, the period for bringing to administrative responsibility is calculated from the day following the last day of the period provided for the performance of the corresponding obligation.
23. According to part 2 of article 4.5 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, failure to comply with the obligation to due date indicates that the administrative offense is not lasting.
24. The limitation period for bringing to administrative responsibility for an offense in respect of which the stipulated legal act the obligation has not been fulfilled by a certain date, begins to flow from the moment the specified period arrives.
25. As can be seen from the materials of the administrative offense case, information about the insured persons in the SZV-M form for the reporting period "" was provided by the individual entrepreneur Andrey Vladimirovich Kuznetsov via telecommunication channels with electronic signature and additionally.
26. Thus, the limitation period for bringing the individual entrepreneur Andrey Vladimirovich Kuznetsov to administrative responsibility at the time of the consideration of the administrative offense case has expired, in connection with which the magistrate reasonably applied the provisions of clause 6 of part 1 of article 24.5 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation and the proceedings were terminated.
27. The arguments of the State Administration - the Office of the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation in the Sovetsky District of Ufa RB, set out in the complaint, the judge finds not convincing, since from the act on revealing an offense in the field of legislation of the Russian Federation on individual registration in the compulsory pension insurance system it follows that initially information about the insured persons on form SZV-M for the reporting period were provided by the individual entrepreneur Kuznetsov Andrey Vladimirovich via telecommunication channels with an electronic signature viz. and additionally; by virtue of part 2 of article 4.5 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, the offense incriminated to a person is not lasting, since the obligation of persons to provide information about insured persons within a certain period is established and regulated by a legal act - Federal Law of 04/01/1996 No. 27-FZ "On individual ( personalized) accounting in the compulsory pension insurance system ”.
28. Based on the foregoing, guided by Articles 30.6, 30.7 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation,

29. Decided:

30. The decision of the magistrate of judicial district No. 2 in the Sovetsky district of Ufa RB dated January 30, 2018 on the termination of proceedings in the case of an administrative offense provided for by Article 15.33.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, in relation to the individual entrepreneur Andrey Vladimirovich Kuznetsov, - leave without change, the complaint of the State Administration - the Office of the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation in the Sovetsky district of the city of Ufa RB - was not satisfied.
31. Solution appellate instance comes into force from the date of its adoption.
32. The decision can be appealed to the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Bashkortostan or his deputy in the manner prescribed by Articles 30.12-30.14 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation.
33. Judge E.R. Abuzarova

Be sure to attend the court session, do not admit responsibility, look for errors in documents and object to the arguments of the FIU. Your arguments: your organization incurred responsibility for the committed administrative offense in the form of payment of a fine, in this regard, the guilty person was punished. Also see the decision in case 12-27 / 2017. Legal services via the Internet and in person + 7-920-985-9888 http://vk.com/lipakov Personal consultation I shake hands, thank you! Do you have an answer to this question? You can leave it by clicking on the button Answer Similar questions How to calculate the term for bringing to administrative responsibility under Art. 7.27 of the Code of the Russian Federation, if in Art. 4.5 COAP about the limitation period of attracting under this article is out of the question? A week later, the court under Article 12.8.2 of the Administrative Code. A husband, deprived of his rights, was driving, and he was caught. The survey showed 0.3 ppm.

Decision in case 12-11 / 2018 (12-403 / 2017;)

Attention

In case of no-show natural person, or legal representative natural person, or legal representative legal entity, in respect of whom the proceedings are underway in the case of an administrative offense, if they are notified in accordance with the established procedure, the protocol on the administrative offense is drawn up in their absence. A copy of the protocol on an administrative offense shall be sent to the person in respect of whom it has been drawn up within three days from the date of drawing up the said protocol.

Info

Secondly, the statute of limitations for bringing you to administrative responsibility may have been missed, in this case it is three months from the date of the administrative offense (Article 4.5 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation). Thirdly, there may be other grounds, but to identify them, it is necessary to study your documents.

Judgment in case 5-455 / 2017

In accordance with the explanations of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 5 of March 24, 2005 "On some issues arising from the courts in the application of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation", an insignificant administrative offense is an action or inaction, although formally it contains signs of an administrative offense, but taking into account the nature of the offense and the role of the offender, the amount of harm and the severity of the consequences that have occurred, it does not represent a significant violation of protected public relations. According to Part 1 of Art. 3.1 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, administrative punishment is a measure of responsibility established by the state for committing an administrative offense and is used to prevent the commission of new offenses, both by the offender himself and by other persons.

An error occurred.

Federal Law "On Accounting" it is he who is responsible for the organization accounting... Thus, Yakov L.A. is the subject of this administrative offense and the arguments of the complaint in this part are unfounded.

Contrary to the arguments of the complaint, the submission of the specified information by the insured independently is not a basis for exemption from administrative liability under Art. 15.33.2 Administrative Code of the Russian Federation. At the same time, the judge finds justified the applicant's arguments about the possibility of applying the institute of insignificance.

According to Art. 2.9 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation in case of insignificance of the committed administrative offense, the judge, body, executive, authorized to resolve the case of an administrative offense, may release the person who committed an administrative offense from administrative responsibility and confine themselves to oral remarks.

The term for bringing to administrative responsibility under Article 15 33 2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation

RULES in the case of an administrative offense on December 13, 2017<АДРЕС, ул. <АДРЕС, 20/1 Мировой судья судебного участка <НОМЕР по <АДРЕС району города <АДРЕС Республики <АДРЕС Корнилова Е.П., рассмотрев материалы дела об административном правонарушении в отношении должностного лица — председателя Некоммерческого партнерства «<АДРЕС коллегия адвокатов» Губайдуллиной Дианы Даилевны, <ДАТА2 рождения, уроженки г. <АДРЕС РБ, ИНН <НОМЕР, зарегистрированной по адресу: <АДРЕС УСТАНОВИЛ: должностное лицо — председатель НП <АДРЕС коллегия адвокатов» Губайдуллина Д.Д. привлекается к административной ответственности по ст.15.33.2 КоАП РФ за то, что не своевременно предоставила сведения о застрахованных лицах по форме СЗВ-М на 13 застрахованных лиц за отчетный период «сентябрь» 2017 г. В судебное заседание Губайдуллина Д.Д.

On the application of Article 15.33.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation

Author: Mikhail 09/22/2017 11:04 Federal Law of 03.07.2016 No. 250-FZ, for offenses, liability for which is established by Article 17 of the Federal Law of 01.04.1996 No. 27-FZ "On individual (personified) accounting in the system of compulsory pension insurance "(hereinafter referred to as Law No. 27-FZ), since 01.01.2017 administrative liability has been introduced under Article 15.33.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation), which provides for a fine of 300 to 500 rub. to the officials of the organization (individual entrepreneur) for failure to submit (including within the prescribed period) information to the FIU, as well as for their submission in an incomplete or distorted form.

Judicial practice under Article 18.15 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation

Thus, the court took all measures to notify the person prosecuted to appear at the hearing, but D.D. Gubaidullina evades appearing in court. According to Part 2 of Article 25.1 of the Administrative Offenses Code of the Russian Federation, the court has the right to consider the case in the absence of the person in respect of whom the proceedings are underway in the case of an administrative offense, if there is data on the proper notification of such a person about the place and time of the consideration of the case and if no petitions have been received from the person about adjournment of the consideration of the case, or such a petition was dismissed.

The court did not receive the indicated motions from the person brought to justice. In this connection, the court considers it possible to consider the case of an administrative offense in the absence of Gubaidullina D.D.

Having studied and evaluated the materials of the case, the court considers D.D. Gubaidullina guilty.

Art. 15.33.2 coap rf with comments

In accordance with article 2.4 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, an official is subject to administrative responsibility if he commits an administrative offense in connection with non-performance or improper performance of his official duties. According to an extract from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, Yakov L.A.
is the chairman of the Oryol military collegium of lawyers. As follows from the job description of the chief accountant of the Oryol military collegium of lawyers, FULL NAME4 manages the formation of statistical and management accounting reports, organizes information support for management accounting, provides statistical reporting, submission in the prescribed manner to the relevant authorities, ensures timely reporting to the pension fund. In accordance with Art.
Of the Code, as well as in the absence of proof of the circumstances on the basis of which the decision was made; 4) on the cancellation of the decision and on the return of the case for a new trial to a judge, to a body, to an official competent to consider the case, in cases of significant violation of the procedural requirements provided for by this Code, if this did not allow a comprehensive, complete and objective consideration of the case. The tasks of proceedings in cases of administrative offenses are a comprehensive, complete, objective and timely clarification of the circumstances of each case, its resolution in accordance with the law, ensuring the execution of the issued resolution, as well as identifying the reasons and conditions that contributed to the commission of administrative offenses (Art.
24.1 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation). As follows from the materials of the case, DD.MM.YY by the Oryol military collegium of lawyers were filed with the UPF in g.

Bringing the chairman of the bar association under article 15 33 2 of the coap of the rf

Pravoved.RU 404 lawyers online now Consult a lawyer online 404 lawyers are ready to answer now Answer in 15 minutes

1. Categories
2. Administrative law

Article 4.5 A decision in a case on an administrative offense cannot be issued after two months (in a case on an administrative offense considered by a judge - after three months) from the date of the commission of an administrative offense Article 23.1 Judges consider cases on administrative offenses provided for in Art. .15.33.2 i.e. an order under this article must be issued within three months. On the other hand, a violation under Article 15.33.2. Refers to violations in the field of insurance legislation.

For failure by the insured to submit within the prescribed time limit or submission by him of incomplete and (or) inaccurate information provided for in clauses 2 - 2.2 of Article 11 of this Federal Law, such insured shall be subject to financial sanctions in the amount of 500 rubles in respect of each insured person. For non-compliance by the insured with the procedure for submitting information in the form of electronic documents in the cases provided for by this Federal Law, financial sanctions in the amount of 1,000 rubles are applied to such an insured.
The result of receiving monthly reports is reflected in the audit protocol. In view of the limited period for accepting reports, we suggest sending monthly reports of the "initial" form by the 5th day of the month.

THE DECISION On January 17, 2018, the city of Oryol Judge of the Soviet District Court of the city of Orel, Samoilova Y.S. on the decision of the magistrate of the judicial plot No. 1 of the Sovetsky district of the city of Orel dated October 27, 2017 on bringing to administrative responsibility under Article 15.33.2 of the Administrative Offenses Code of the Russian Federation, ESTABLISHED: .2017 Chairman of the Oryol military collegium of lawyers Yakov L.A. brought to administrative responsibility under Article 15.33.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation. Chairman of the Oryol military collegium of lawyers Yakov L.A. appealed to the Sovetskiy District Court of Orel with a complaint against the said decision.

However, all these legends remain legends with no evidence. There is only small confirmation of the origin of these legends - in 1960, during excavations in northern Newfoundland in the town of L'An's-a-Meadows, the remains of the North's dwellings were found from this distant time. Currently, this territory belongs to the Canadian provinces of Newfoundland and Labrador. Although the Vikings' exploration of the territory of North America long before the travels of Christopher Columbus is considered a definitively proven fact, the exact place of their settlement is still the subject of scientific dispute.

The first visits to America by Europeans did not affect the life of the indigenous population - the Indians.