What document confirms the effectiveness and quality of PPE. Methods of reducing the class of working conditions when applying employees of efficient PPE

  
- effectiveness of PPE? Never heard. There are certificates.

Workers complain about uncomfortable sizes - quickly fail (30 minutes) and you have to shoot them. Do not want to hear about certificates. Give them comfortable respirators and that's it. What to do? What criteria are the convenience of respirators and in general PPE normally fixed? If there are documents, throw in a personal, please!

Gentlemen, who is evaluating the effectiveness of PPE? (P.8 of the Protocol of Efficiency of SIZ). Thank you!

Did you have experience in evaluating the effectiveness of PPE? Share please!

I estimated the effectiveness of the SIZ as their ability to reliably protect the employee from harmful or dangerous factorTo protect which they are intended. To do this, compare the characteristics of PPE protective properties With the actual levels of specific factors. If they overlap them, then SIZ is effective. Other Phase Parameters I do not consider: comfort, anthropometric data, durability (but take into account the preservation of protective properties), the quality of manufacture, etc.

And how to evaluate effective they or not?)) How to find out how much do clothes protect the employee?

We have no scientifically based methodologies for the use of PP ...

These quotes from labor protection forums indicate that the issues of evaluating the effectiveness of SIZ in workplaces are not experts.

The interest of labor protection professionals in justifying the use of the most effective SIZ in the workplaces is obvious. This requires legislation, the responsibility of the employer and common sense.

But the position of the procurement procedures responsible for the procurement procedures is also obvious, and the certificate or declaration is also approved by the necessary and sufficient criterion. And then everything solves the price of the market.

And finally, the opinion of the workers themselves, whom on the TC, it is necessary to ensure safe working conditions, and which are forced to work in harmful conditions for the production need. Their assessment of the issued PM is ignored by employers in 90% of cases.
There are signs of conflict of interest between employees and the employer in the person of the enterprise services responsible for ensuring safe Conditions Labor. And bear the numbers of the arguments of those and others in this dispute.

Let's try to deal with all sides. In this material - only the beginning of the conversation.

To the history of the question

In the Regulatory Documents of the European Union, the effectiveness of PP effectiveness has been identified for many years as a necessary condition in the field of employer's responsibility. So in Directive 89/656 / EEC dated 30.11.1989 "On the minimum safety and health requirements for the use of workers in the workplace" says:

It is necessary to estimate the employer and determine the characteristics that the SIZ should have to ensure that the PPE effectively protects against dangers.

Criteria for the effectiveness of SIZ. russian specialists worked out in the early 2000s, which confirm the regulatory documents of those years. For example:

Manual P 2.2.2006-05, paragraph 5.11.6. In coordination with territorial departments Federal Service According to supervision in the field of consumer rights and the well-being of a person, working conditions can be assessed as less harmful (per step) ... when using effective (having a certificate of conformity) of funds individual protection. 

But while the effectiveness of PPE remained the subject of attention of narrow specialists and experts. And only in 2011 the question entered the area of \u200b\u200bregulation of the profile ministry - the Ministry of Health and Social Development.

Order 342n, paragraph 33. When evaluating the provision of workers, the PPE can additionally be assessed by the effectiveness of the EC personnel issued by the employee. The effectiveness of the SIZ employee issued is confirmed by the fulfillment of the requirements of labor safety standards that determine the set of measures to ensure the effective use of PPE in workplaces.

Everything became very serious with the adoption of Law No. FZ-426 dated December 28, 2013 special assessment Working conditions ":

NPZ-426 Article 14, P.6 In the case of applications by employees, employed in workplaces with harmful working conditions, effective means of individual protection, which have completed mandatory certification in the manner prescribed by the relevant technical regulations, the class (subclass) of working conditions may be reduced Commission on the basis of the conclusion of an expert of an organization conducted by a special assessment of working conditions, one degree.

For the first time, legal prerequisites were identified for the allocation of the nomenclature of effective personal protective equipment, the use of which employees could be the basis for reducing the class of working conditions.

Leaving beyond the ethics ambiguous from the point of view of ethics, the question of reducing compensation for harmful working conditions when applying effective PPE, focus on what.
A new norm is recorded - efficiency. That is, certified PPEs can be effective in workplaces, and may be ineffective.

With the fixation of the norm, the question of criteria and evaluation of efficiency immediately arose. MINTRRU promised during the year to release the appropriate technique, and did not fail.

After a year of the taking expectation, the order of the Ministry of Labor of the Russian Federation No. 976n dated December 5, 2014 was published "On the method of reducing class (subclass) working conditions when applying by workers engaged in workplaces with harmful working conditions, effective PPE, which have completed mandatory certification in the manner prescribed by the relevant technical Regulations.

The regulatory chain closed. There was a regulatory impact, although insignificant, but sufficient for some changes in the positions of participants in labor relations.

To be continued…

21.01.2018 9:24:00

Specialists of the Klin Institute for the Protection and Conditions of Labor developed a methodology for expert assessment of the effectiveness of the use of SIZ in workplaces. In the development and testing of the methodology, experts of OJSC "Siberian Coal Energy Company", OJSC MHC Eurochim, Self-Regulatory Organization "Association of Developers, Manufacturers and Individual Protection Tools" and Labor Medicine Rams.

Specialists The Klin Institute for the Protection and Conditions of Labor has developed a methodology for expert assessment of the effectiveness of using SIZ in workplaces. In the development and testing of the methodology, experts at the Siberian Coal Energy Company, OJSC MHC EuroChem, took part, Self-regulating organization "Association of Developers, Manufacturers and Suppliers of Individual Protection" and Labor Medicine Ramna .

Andrei Moskvichyev,
general Director of Klin
Institute for Protection and Labor Conditions

Viktor Ivanov,
leading Researcher
JSC "Klin Institute for Protection and Labor Conditions"

It is known that work in harmful, dangerous and other special conditions of labor is conjugate professional risk For the life and health of employees. One of the measures to reduce professional risk to ensure safe working conditions is the use of personal protective equipment (hereinafter referred to as PPE). Workplaces in workplaces are used in cases where impact on employees production factors, extremely permissible concentrations (hereinafter referred to as MPC) and extremely permissible levels (hereinafter referred to as the states) exceed the established normatives, it is impossible to avoid or limit by applying other measures, including funds collective protection. Thus, the use of PPE is the last and often the only possible barrier between the Ra Batnik and the potential danger to his life and health.

Taking into account the dependence of the level of injuries and the professional incidence of workers from the necessary security and proper use of PPE, their ineffectative use should be considered as one of the sources of hazards in the workplace. Therefore, ineffective use of PPE is advisable to include in the number of identified hazards when evaluating professional risks. In this regard, there is a need to develop a methodology for assessing the effectiveness of the use of SIZ in workplaces as a professional risk assessment element. Based on the analysis of existing security and use of SIZ in the workplace, it can be concluded that the effectiveness of using PPE in workplaces largely depends on their correct choice and application.

So, in force in the Russian Federation, inter-sectoral rules for providing employees with special clothing, special shoes and other personal protective equipment (approved by the Order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia dated 01.06.2009 No. 290n (hereinafter referred to as the order of the Ministry of Healthcores-Vities of Russia No. 290n) are based on the principle of rationing. However, the principle of normalization does not guarantee the employee's safety of his labor, since in typical norms free issuance Special clothing, special shoes and other means of an individual dual defense approved by the orders of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia, there is no classification by protective properties of PPE.

Because of this, a number of enterprises are discrepancy or incomplete match The actual working conditions issued to the actual working conditions, primarily the lack of a methodology for assessing the effectiveness of the use of SIZ on the RA-Boom (on protective properties, by the correctness of the choice of PPE, etc.).

Under the evaluation of the effectiveness of the use of PPE in the workplace, it is necessary to understand the expert assessment of the organization of processes and measures aimed at the use of certified SIZ to prevent and (or) reduce the levels of impact on workers of harmful and (or) hazardous production factors.

Typical norms often cannot cover the specifics of each production. In certain workplaces, there may be an effect on the health of the harmful factors that were not taken into account in the type-out regulations, but from which the employee needs to be protected.

Therefore, it is necessary to record the effect of all production factors available at a particular workplace.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of using PPE. In the proposed method, two groups of indicators are introduced, which allow you to expertly evaluate (for example, when conducting certification of jobs under working conditions), the effectiveness of using PPE.

First group of indicators reflects the procedure for selecting PPIs ( group B.).
Second group of indicators characterizes the use of PPE in the workplace ( group P.).

Group indicators B.

The list of indicators of the group B, ha-punishable correctness of the choice of PPE, includes:

the indicator of the VF (factor), with the help of which, the correspondence of the disheveled list of harmful and (or) hazardous production factors in the workplace is estimated;
an indicator of VC (class), with the help of which the compliance of the protective properties of the worker issued by the PM, the working place established for production factors, is estimated;
indicator in (industry), with the help of which the compliance of the protective properties of the SIZ industry specificity of technological processes is estimated;
wu (convenience), with the help of which the consumer properties of the SIZ issued, the convenience of their application and compliance with the individual sizes of the employee.

The list of regulatory legal acts and other sources of information needed to justify the indicators of the group B, looks like this:

Labor Code of the Russian Federation (Art. 212, 213, 215, 221);
decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated December 24, 2009 No. 1213 "On approval of the technical regulations on the safety of personal protective equipment" (PP. 8, 11-13);
order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia No. 290n (p. 12);
order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia dated 09/01/2010 No. 777n "On approval of the Ti-voir standards of free issuance of special clothing, special shoes and other means of individual protection of work-nicknames in works with harmful and (or) hazardous working conditions, as well as on Works performed in special overproecort or contamination related "(hereinafter referred to as the Order of the Ministry of Health-Social Development of Russia No. 777n);
GOST 12.4.011-89 "System of labor safety standards. Means of protecting working. General requirements and classification ", approved. Resolution of Gosstan Dart of the USSR from 10/27/1989№ 3222 (PP. 2.1, 2.4);
manual P 2.2.2006-05 "Guide to the hygienic assessment of the factors of workplace environments and the employment process. Crete-Rii and classification of working conditions ", approved. 07/29/2005 (hereinafter referred to as Manual R 2.2.2006-05);
industry regulatory documents that determine the specifics of the use of SIZ in workplaces;
list of factors of the production environment and labor process in the workplace;
measurement protocols and estimates of production factor levels in the workplace;
protocols for assessing the provision of RA-Bootnikov SIZ in the workplace;
technical documentation (Passport) on PPE.

Indicators of the group P.

Wide distribution received situations where the employer is limited only to the issuance of normalized PPE. If the employee is not trained by the simplest ways to check its health and performance, the effectiveness of using PPE can noticeably decrease.

The list of indicators of the group P, characterizing the correctness of the choice of PPE, is as follows:

the indicator of software (training), with the help of which the training of employees is assessed by the rules for the use of SIZ in workplaces, taking into account the peculiarities of the technological process, pro-steps to check their performance and health, as well as the implementation of training for the use of PPE;
pT indicator (injuries), which demonstrates the dependence of the occurrence of injury from non-use of PPE;
the PV indicator (time), with the help of which is estimated to be the correspondence of the wearing time of the SIZ issued by the employee, the SRO-ku, during which the manufacturer guarantees the preservation of the Protection Properties of the PPE (taking into account the time of storage and care - the higher the warranty period, the better ;
pI (testing) indicator with the help of which the timeliness of the verification of health (test) is estimated (testing) PPE (mark, stamp, stamp, protocol, etc.), established regulatory documents, as well as the recommendations of the PPE manufacturers (PI indicator is defined in the case of the presence of national standards that establish the timing of testing and verifying the health of PPE);
the indicator of the PZ (complaint), with the help of which the presence of complaints from employees on the consumer properties of issued, PPE (including comfort and ease of use).

The list of regulatory legal acts and other sources of information necessary to justify the indicators of the group P look as follows:

Labor Code of the Russian Federation (Art. 212, 214, 227, 383);
order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia No. 290n (PP. 10, 21, 22, 24);
order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia No. 777n;
GOST 12.0.004-90 "System of labor safety standards, occupational safety organization, General provisions", Approved. Resolution of the USSR State Standard from 05.11.1990 № 2797(PP. 4.3, 4.4);
manual P 2.2.2006-05;
collective agreement, agreements, labor contracts;
personal accounting cards for issuing PPE;
marks, stamps, stamps, protocols, etc., confirming the conduct of verification of health (tests) of PPE;
protocols for assessing the security of workers in the workplace;
training programs, control magazines, personal clutch passing cards, etc.;
journal of Accidents Registration;
operational documentation (passport) to PPE.

Analysis of entries in accidents on industrial accidents (form H-1),
where the reasons for each specific case are indicated, allows you to evaluate
Availability / absence industrial injuriesassociated with non-use (or incorrect application / selection) PPE for this profession, on specific production.

Evaluation cards for indicators. For each indicator, evaluation cards are developed, including an indicator, verification performed during job certification, check result and evaluation result.

Evaluation cards for indicators Group B.include the following data:

on the results of inspections of the provision of employees of the SIZ in accordance with the Protection of the Security Service of the PPF employee;
on the results of the inspections of the compliance of the Department of all harmful and (or) hazardous production factors in the workplace issued by the employee (indicator of VF);
on the results of inspections of the compliance of the working place issued by the SIF classes in the workplace (indicated in the certificate of workplace certification, under the working conditions) and on the assessment of the security of the employee of the PPE (VK indicator);
on the results of inspections of the compliance of the PM issued by the physical sizes (growth, completeness, volume, etc.) and the relevant complaints of workers (Wu indicator).

A consolidated version of the evaluation card for indoor in Includes the following data:

on the results of the inspection of the presence of the SIZ-liqueurness to the types and concentrations of chemical products (reagents) and high-tech substances available in the workplaces;
on the results of the inspection of the presence of the sophistication of several PPS, comprehensively used by the employee in the workplace;
on the results of the inspection of the presence of fire-blasting and antistatic SIZ when using them with an employee in dangerous places;
on the results of the inspection of the presence of the Wheelness of the SIZ, which manifests themselves in their rapid cleaning during washing;
on the results of the inspection of the presence in the organization responsible for the timely and in full, the issuance of workers of Kam SIZ, who passed in installed manner certification or declarorization of conformity.

Objects of verification when conducting an assessment for Indicator V. are:

operational documentation (PAS-Port) to PPE;
measurement protocols and estimates of production factors, reflected in the workplace certification map;
the presence of a confirmation document (order, order, position, etc.) on the appointment of the personally responsible for the organizational and in full, the issuance of SIZ employees.

It is important that the manufacturer in the passport to PSS will indicate not only the absolute values \u200b\u200bof reducing the level of impact on the employee of a harmful and (or) hazardous factor, but also introduced the appropriate CDC codification by category. This is necessary in order for a specialist choosing PPE to the technical characteristics contained in the passport to PPE, as a class of working conditions (according to the specified factor), this PPE can provide the necessary protection.

Evaluation cards for indicators Groups P.include the following data:

on the results of the inspection of the existence of a labor protection training program, including the topic on the use of PPE, testing journals for monitoring the labor protection of labor and the use of PPE, as well as verification of the results of the USP employee for use (indicator of software);
on the results of the inspection of the availability of industrial injuries on the RA-Bochih places associated with the non-separation of SIZ (according to the acts of accidents and the results of their investigations) (PT indicator);
on the results of checking the conformity of the time of carrying out SIZ, issued by work-nickname, the time of guaranteed maintaining protective properties (records in the personal account of the depreciation of the SIZ employee and the timeline specified in Passport (PV indicator);
on the results of verification of the timely manner of the consistency of health (tests) of the PPE (test protocols, stamps, stamps, etc.) (show-tel PI);
on the results of the inspection of cases return by the employee issued to PM with poor consumer properties (on the basis of complaints of workers for discomfort, inconvenience of application, etc.), based on the analysis of records in the Protection Protection (PZh).

Special attention should be paid to the "Estimation of the Protective Properties of the PM to meet the working conditions classes" ( indicator VK). The more harmful working conditions, the more harmful factors exceed hygienically standards, respectively, in such a situation there should be higher protective properties of PPE.

The European Union has an 89/656 / EES directive of 30.11.1989 on the minimum requirements in the field of health and safety when using employees of personalized-shields in the workplace, according to which the period of wearing PPE should be determined based on the seriousness of the risk, the frequency of exposure to risk and features of the workplace of each employee.

Features of choosing SIZ respiratory organs

As an example of assessing the conformity of the Claims issued by the Classes in the workplace (indicator VK), we consider the features of the choice of the PPE of the filtering type respiratory organs (chemical factor) depending on the class of working conditions for the chemical factor.

When choosing a meal of filter respiration organs, the following indicators are taken into account:

substances that are protected;
concentration of such substances;
protection coefficient;
penetration coefficient;
supply coefficient;
initial resistance to airflow;
protection time;
weight;
features of use, caused by the age of users and their physiognomic features (head size, geometric parameters of the face and neck, the presence of beard,usov, etc.).

In this case, the key indicator taken into account in the selection of this type of PPE is a protection coefficient that is under-free, taking into account the detected excess of the PDC (remote control) of the production factor in the workplace. It is very important to take into account the value of the PV indicator reflecting the correspondence of the period of wearing a seizure of the SIZ time to preserve its protective properties guaranteed by the manufacturer, with the intensity of the influence of the factor (level, conituation), which is declared in the PSP Passport. First of all, this is relevant in relation to the SIZ of the respiratory organs.

The use of the considered methodology for assessing the effectiveness of the use of PPE will help specialists in labor protection, responsible for the acquisition, timely and in full issue of the PPE correctly determine their choice. This technique can also be useful to Rospotrebnadzor specialists when making decisions to reduce the degree of harmfulness of working conditions at a particular workplace on the basis of an assessment of the effectiveness of the use of SIZ.

The certificate is a document that underestimates that PPE has the properties-mi, which are declared in the passport. It is issued by the certification body based on the manufacturer of the Protocols on the tests carried out by the tests of the SECURITY Safety Requirements (for the employee who is wears and for ambient), as well as protocols for testing protective properties of PPE.

The result of expert assessments of the group's indicators in and group P are qualitative estimates - "yes" (the assessment is positive) and "no" (negative assessment).

In general, to assess the effectiveness of the use of PPE in the workplace, depending on the evaluations obtained, indicators should be guided by the following rules:

satisfactory If all the indicators of the group B and group n have positive estimates ("yes");
the effectiveness of using PPE in the workplace is dissatisfaction-telny If there is at least one negative rating ("no").

In accordance with paragraph 5.11.6 of the leadership of R 2.2.2006-05, in coordination with the territorial departments of Rospotrebnadzor, the working conditions can be assessed as less harmful (per step, but not lower than class 3.1), in the following cases:

with a reduction in contact time with harmful factors (time protection) in accordance with the recommendations given in Appendix 7 of this manual, or developed by the specialists of the territorial bodies and institutions of Rospotrebnadzor, scientific or educational organizations of the hygienic profile;
when using efficient (having a certificate of conformity) of personal protective equipment.

In the manual, P 2.2.2006-05 it is indicated that the SIZ should not simply comply with the regulations, but be effective. It is important to draw attention to the fact that under the "SIZ effectiveness" in the title manual, it is imposed on the presence of a corresponding certificate "availability". At the same time, in accordance with the provisions of Art. 212, 221. Labor Code RF SIZ must have a certificate.

If you directly follow the provisions of the draft r 2.2.2006-05, it is possible that the situation in which organizations that fulfill the requirements for providing workers with Serving PPE will receive the right when using effective (i.e. having a certificate of conformity) SIZ to reduce the class of working conditions on one step. Euthenically, a decrease in the class of working conditions in accordance with the requirements of Art. 92, 117, 147 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation leads to a change in the amount of compensation to employees. Therefore, it is not necessary to say that this PPE is effective because it has a certificate (declaration) of compliance, incorrectly. The fact that the employee is issued certified PPE according to the standard does not mean that its effective protection is provided.

In order to further reform the labor protection management system by the authorities executive power A new procedure for holding job certification under working conditions and assessing professional risks is being developed. The draft procedure provides for the procedure for assessing the effectiveness of the use of the PC and the security of the employee who uses PPE from medium and high professional risks.

In particular, it is assumed that in order to reduce the class of working conditions, organizations (employers) will not provide employees with certified PPE certified according to regulations. This will also require an assessment of the efficiency of using SIZ data by checking the relevant assessment procedure.Often, the employer is difficult to determine with the choice of PPE, there are compliant expert recommendations, however, they concern not all types of PPE.

It is alarming the situation in which the equipment-tel is economically motivated only to comply with the standard standards for issuing PPE, for the deviation from which penalties and other measures are imposed on it. At the same time, the employer does not have a motivation to provide an expert assessment of the effectiveness of the use of PPE, taking into account the complaints of employees. In practice, the situation is common when SIZ for the organization is selected (purchased) in accordance with the norms not even specialists of the labor protection service, but supplying, which, when purchasing PPE acquisition, first and foremost, comparing market prices. The procedure for assessing the effectiveness of the use of PPCs (as an element of professional risk assessment) should be carried out by qualified specialists of independent certified (certified) organizations.

06.01.2017 9:41:00

Order of the Ministry of Labor of Russia dated December 5, 2014 No. 976n approved the method of reducing class (subclass) of working conditions when applying employees employed in workplaces with harmful working conditions, effective personal protective equipment that have completed mandatory certification in the manner prescribed by the relevant technical regulations ...

Order of the Ministry of Labor of Russia dated December 5, 2014 No. 976n approved a method for reducing class (subclass) of working conditions when applying employees employed in workplaces with harmful working conditions, effective personal protective equipment that have completed mandatory certification in the manner prescribed by the relevant technical regulations.

How to estimate the effectiveness of the use of PPE

The method of reducing the class (subclass) of working conditions when applying by workers engaged in workplaces with harmful working conditions, determines the requirements for the procedures for assessing the effectiveness of personal protective equipment applied by employees ( further - SIZ) who have completed compulsory certification in the manner prescribed by the technical regulations of the Customs Union "On the Security of Individual Protection Funds" Tr Ts 019/2011, approved by the Commission of the Customs Union dated December 9, 2011 No. 878, and provides the ability to reduce the class (subclass) of conditions Labor under application separate species Effective PPE.

The technical regulations of the Customs Union applies to the means of individual protection, regardless of the country of origin, which has previously been in operation (new) and issued into circulation in the Unified Customs Territory of the Customs Union.

As is known, the Methodology is aimed at solving the problem of the absence of economic incentives for employers to ensure its employees with highly efficient PPE, which reduces the effectiveness of the practical implementation of the Federal Law "On Special Evaluation of Working Conditions" of December 28, 2013 No. 426-FZ and does not contribute to improving the security of workers' health .

The technique does not apply In cases:

Evaluation of the effectiveness of SIZ. It is conducted by an expert of the Organization to solve the employer during the current. It is an assessment of business processes operating at the employer aimed at using PPE to reduce the impact of harmful factors of production, and includes :

evaluating the compliance of the name of the SIZ and the norms of their issuance to the names of the SIZ and the standards of their issuance, provided for by the standard standards of free issuing certified specialized clothing workers, special shoes and other personal protective equipment approved by the order of the Ministry of Health and social Development RF "On approval of standard standards for free issuance of certified special clothing, special shoes and other means of individual protection to employees of through occupations and posts of all sectors of the economy engaged in works with harmful and (or) hazardous working conditions, as well as on the works performed in special temperature conditions or contamination related "dated October 1, 2008 No. 541n;
an assessment of the availability of documents confirming the compliance with the requirements of the technical regulations;
assessment of the availability of operational documentation and labeling of the SIZ corresponding to the requirements of the technical regulation and the PPC fees;
evaluation of the effectiveness of the choice and application of PPE.

The estimated SIZ must have a certificate of conformity confirming their compliance with the requirements established by the technical regulations. Individual protective equipment should also have labeling and operational documentation that make it possible to identify the basic parameters of these funds that reduce the impact on workers of harmful production factors. In addition, the PPE complexity must comply with the accompanying documents and operational documentation.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of the use of PPE includes an assessment of the choice and assessment of the use of PPE . Correctness of choice funds for a particular workplace are expected to evaluate based following rates :

the compliance of the deposit of harmful factors of the production environment identified in the workplace on the results of the results;
the compliance of the protective properties of the SIZ class (subclass) of the working conditions established for harmful factors of the production environment at the workplace on the results of the OUT;
compliance with consumer properties, convenience and individual sizes of the employee.

A comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of the SIZ is carried out on the basis of a scoring assessment of each of the indicators of the effectiveness of the choice and application of PPF (VF, VK, Wu, VS, PV, PI, PNZ, PPZ). In particular, the VF is an indicator of the SIZ compliance with an employee issued, a list of harmful production factors in the workplace, and PV is an indicator of the satisfaction of the use of SIZ, the term of guaranteed preservation of protective properties of PPE with appropriate storage and care.

When assessing the use of PP It is supposed to consider the following indicators :

According to the results of the EFF estimate, the expert issues a protocol for assessing the effectiveness of employees used by workers engaged in workplaces with harmful working conditions, personal protective equipment that have completed mandatory certification in the manner prescribed by the technical regulations for the objectives of the class (subclass) of working conditions.

Reducing the class of working conditions on specific examples

The procedure for reducing the class (subclass) of working conditions when applying by workers engaged in workplaces with harmful working conditions, effective PPE is quite time-consuming and complex.

Let us give two examples from the practice when attempts to reduce the class of working conditions due to the use of PPE, but in both cases a conclusion was issued about the impossibility of a class decline.

In the first case, the effectiveness of PPE was carried out in the oil company. The conclusion on the impossibility of a class decline was drawn up on the basis of the indicator of the VF. In the second case, the conclusion was drawn up for an energy company on the basis of the PV indicator.

However, if applicable to PPD employees will be recognized as effective and theoretically, it is considered possible, then the class (subclass) of working conditions can be reduced by one degree, and the employer will receive direct benefits, for example, by reducing insurance payments on compulsory social insurance.

Example 1.

The expert of the appraisal organization assigns a metal cleaner, castings, products and parts (occupied on the purification of the fraction, the crushing of the metal and metal parts and products) the harmfulness subclass 3.3. After evaluating the SIZ, the harmful class may be lowered to subclass 3.2. In this case, the size of the additional tariff for insurance premiums in the FIU in accordance with Federal law "On the compulsory pension insurance in the Russian Federation" of December 15, 2001 No. 167-FZ will decrease from 6% to 4% (Table 1).

Table 1

Class of working conditions		Additional rate
Dangerous	4	8,0
Harmful	3.4	7,0
	3.3	6,0
	3.2	4,0
	3.1	2,0
Permissible	2	0,0
Optimal	1	0,0

The decline in class (subclass) of working conditions is carried out in relation to a harmful production factor, to protect against which the estimated PPE is applied and is allowed for one degree if:

working conditions in the workplace during the implementation of the currently attributed to the harmful working conditions of 2-4 degrees;
procedures (steps 1-3) are fully implemented;
value comprehensive assessment SIZ effectiveness is greater than or equal to 0.9 points;
to protect against the impact of a harmful production factor, in respect of which the class (subclass) of working conditions is carried out, the employee is used by no more than one type of PPE, which has undergone mandatory certification in the manner prescribed by the technical regulations;
at the relevant workplaces, serviceable means of collective protection of workers are applied.

Example 2.

An estimated organization's expert assigns a drill technique (occupied on drilling wells) Calmfulness subclass 3. After evaluating the SIZ, the harmful class may be reduced to subclass 3.1. In this case, the benefits in the form of an abbreviated week according to the Labor Code of the Russian Federation are not assigned (Table 2).

table 2

Class of working conditions		Supplement 4. %	Additional vacation (from 7 days)	Abbreviated 36th work week
Dangerous	4	yes	yes	yes
Harmful	3.4	yes	yes	yes
	3.3	yes	yes	yes
	3.2	yes	yes	not
	3.1	yes	not	not
Permissible	2	not	not	not
Optimal	1	not	not	not

4. To protect against the impact of a harmful production factor, in respect of which the class (subclass) of working conditions is carried out, the employee is used by no more than one type of PPE, which has completed mandatory certification in the manner prescribed by the technical regulation.

5. In the relevant workplaces, serviceable means of collective protection of workers are used.

6. There is a coordination territorial body federal Body executive authority operating on the organization and implementation of the federal state sanitary and epidemiological supervision. And if initially in the workplace, the level of harmfulness was treated to the subclass 3.1, then it is possible to transition to class 2. This means that the additional rate will not have to pay at all.

A decrease in class (subclass) of working conditions is not allowed below the subclass 3.1 of harmful working conditions.

Summing up, it can be concluded that the decline in class (subclass) of working conditions is a time-consuming and complex procedure. It is necessary to spend a lot of time at the preparation stage and during the procedure for assessing the effectiveness of the use of SIZ employees. Despite the fact that in practice, the cases of reducing the class of working conditions due to the use of effective Wide distribution, the methodology considered by us, in addition to improving the working conditions of workers, can bring a significant economic effect associated with a corresponding reduction in the level of surcharges and compensation to employees for employees Work in harmful and dangerous working conditions.

The use of personal protective equipment is the last, and often the only possible barrier between the potential danger and accident. This barrier must be as efficient as possible.

It is known that work in harmful and dangerous conditions of labor is associated with professional risk for the life and health of employees. One of its decline to ensure safe working conditions is the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). They are needed in cases where the impacts on employees of the levels of harmful and (or) hazardous production factors cannot be avoided or limited by applying other measures, including collective protection products.

Taking into account the dependence of the level of injuries and the professional morbidity of workers from the proper support and use of PPE, ineffective use of their use can be considered as a source of hazards in the workplace and include in the number of dangerous hazards in assessing professional risks. Therefore, it is necessary to develop methods for expert assessment of the effectiveness of the use of SIZ in workplaces as a professional risk assessment element. Specialists of the Klin Institute for the Protection and Conditions of Labor, such a technique was created. In its development and approbation, experts of the Siberian Coal Energy Company, OJSC "MCC EuroChem", a self-regulatory organization "Association of Developers, Manufacturers and Providers of Individual Protection" and Labor Medicine of the RAMS.

Under an assessment of the effectiveness of the use of SIZ in the workplace in this case, we will understand the expert assessment of the organization of processes and measures aimed at using certified PPCs to prevent and (or) reduce the levels of impact on workers of harmful and (or) hazardous production factors.

The efficiency of using SIZ in the workplace largely depends on their correct choice and application. For example, acting in Russian Federation Inter-sectoral "Rules for providing employees with special clothing, special shoes and other means of individual protection" are based on the principle of rationing. This principle does not guarantee the employee's safety of his work, since in the typical norms of the free issuance of certified PPCs there is no classification by protective properties of PPE. In this regard, in some organizations there is a discrepancy or incomplete compliance of the disabilities issued by the actual working conditions, which is due to the lack of a methodology for assessing the effectiveness of the use of PPE in the workplace, depending on the working conditions (on protective properties, according to the correctness of the choice of PPF, etc. ).

Typical Norms of FREE issuing PPE often cannot cover the specifics of each production. Therefore, the accounting of all factors in this workplace is required. In the full life cycle, several stages are distinguished: production; using; service.

The use of PPE is the most important stage for consumers of PPE. In the proposed methodology for the effectiveness of the use of PMI, two groups of indicators are entered, which allow us to evaluate expertly, when conducting job certification. The first group of indicators reflects the procedure for choosing the PPE, the second - characterizes their use in the workplace.

The indicators characterizing the correctness of the choice of PPE can be attributed:

a) the correspondence of the deposit of harmful and (or) hazardous production factors in the workplace issued to

b) Compliance of protective properties of SIZ classes of working conditions at the workplace established for production factors.

When job certification, under labor conditions, the excess of the actual indicators of factors over hygienic standards is determined. Accordingly, if there is an excess, the SIZ must have increased efficiency;

c) compliance with the protective properties of the SIZ labor conditions of the sectoral specifics of technological processes;

d) Consumer Properties of SIZ, ease of use and compliance with individual sizes of the employee.

In addition, the correctness of the choice of PPE characterizes the indicators that estimate:

a) conducting employees of employees with the rules for the use of SIZ in workplaces, taking into account the characteristics of the technological process, the simplest ways to verify their performance, health care, and the implementation of training for the use of PPE;

b) the dependence of the occurrence of injuries in cases of non-use of PPE.

In the classifier of the causes of production injuries, there is an item: injuries associated with the non-separation of PPE. According to statistical information, it is possible to assess the consequences of non-separation of PPE - and in this profession, and in particular production, and in the industry;

c) Matching the Time Socks Time During which the manufacturer guarantees the preservation of the protective properties of the PPE (taking into account the time of storage and maintenance). Obviously, the higher the warranty period, the more qualitative to PPE;

d) the presence of timely inspection of the health care (mark, stamp, stamp, protocol, etc.), established by regulatory documents, as well as the recommendations of the manufacturers of PPE;

e) the presence of complaints from employees to the consumer properties of PPM issued, including comfort and ease of use.

The listed indicators are set in accordance with current regulatory legal actsthat contain the requirements for PPE. For each of them, evaluation maps are developed, including the indicator performed by checking when job certification, check result and evaluation result.

It is especially worth paying attention to an indicator that estimates the protective properties of PPE for compliance with labor conditions. The greater the degree of harmfulness of working conditions, the greater the harmful factor exceeds hygienic standards and the higher the protective properties of PPE should be. It is necessary that the manufacturer in the passport indicate not only the absolute values \u200b\u200bof reducing the level of impact on the employee of a harmful and (or) hazardous factor, but also a certain category. A specialist choosing a SIZ for the organization, according to the technical characteristics given in the Passport of PSS, knew, with what class of working conditions (according to the specified factor), this PPE ensures protection, that is, it provides a decrease in the actual level of factor to hygienic standards.

The indicator that estimates the satisfaction of the time of SIZ sesters by an employee of the time guaranteed by the manufacturer of preserving the protective properties of the SIZ at that concentration, which is declared in the Passport of SIZ. This is especially true for the protection of respiratory authorities. In the EU, there is an "directive in the field of professional security and the health of workers' health 89.656.Eez", according to which the period of sovop socks should be determined, based on the seriousness of the risk, the frequency of exposure to risk, the features of the workplace of each employee. In general, the following rule is proposed for the effectiveness of the effectiveness of the use of PPE in the workplace, depending on the evaluations obtained:

a) satisfactory - if all the indicators have positive estimates;

b) unsatisfactory - if one of the estimates is negative.

The use of the considered technique will help specialists of the labor protection service properly determine the choice and procurement of PPE. It can also be useful for specialists of Rospotrebnadzor in making decisions about the decline in the degree of harmfulness of working conditions at a given workplace on the basis of an assessment of the effectiveness of using PPP.

In accordance with paragraph 5.11.6 of the leadership of P 2.2.2006-05, in coordination with the territorial departments of the Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare, the working conditions can be assessed as less harmful (per step, but not lower than class 3.1. ) In the following cases:

a) while reducing contact time with harmful factors (time protection);

b) when using effective (having a certificate of conformity)

personal protective equipment. In the leadership of P 2.2.2006-05, it is true that SIZ should not simply meet the standards, but be effective. But "efficiency" in this document Deciphered as a certificate of CES certificate. And in accordance with Art. 212, 221 TK RF (197-FZ) SIZ must have a certificate. If you follow the letter of the manual p 2.2.2006-05, it turns out that all organizations that fulfill the requirements that provided the issuance of certified PPE employees according to standard regulations automatically receive the right to lower the working class of working conditions for one level. Naturally, a decrease in class working conditions according to the requirements of Article 92, 117, 147 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation leads to changes in compensation to employees.

It is effective for this PPE effectively because it has a certificate (declaration) of conformity - incorrectly. If the employee issued certified PPEs according to the standard, this does not mean that effective protection is provided. The certificate is a document confirming that the PPE has the properties that are stated in the passport. In the present, as part of the further modernization of labor-proof legislation, the procedure for assessing professional risks and certification of jobs is being developed. It is assumed that in order to reduce the class of working conditions to organizations (employers) will not be enough (as now) only to provide employees certified PPE in accordance with regulations - it will be necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of these SIZ, conducting an appropriate assessment procedure for a certified independent (certificate) organization.

Also, in accordance with the new procedure for the certification of jobs under working conditions, approved by the Order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation No. 342n dated April 26, 2011, an increase of the effectiveness of the EFF issued by the employee. At the same time, the effectiveness of the SIZ is confirmed by the fulfillment of the requirements of labor safety standards that determine the set of measures to ensure the effective use of PPE in workplaces.

According to O-Journal.

"Labor protection and safety on industrial enterprises", 2012, N 9

Efficiency of using PPE as a professional risk assessment element

Specialists of the Klin Institute for the Protection and Conditions of Labor developed a methodology for expert assessment of the effectiveness of using SIZ in the workplace. In the development and testing of the methodology, experts of OJSC "Siberian Coal Energy Company", OJSC MHK Eurochem, Self-Regulatory Organization "Association of Developers, Manufacturers and Providers of Individual Protection" and the Research Institute of Labor Medicine Ramna.

It is known that work in harmful and dangerous conditions of labor is associated with professional risk for the life and health of employees. One of the measures to reduce professional risk to ensure safe working conditions is the use of personal protective equipment.

Individual protective equipment (PPE) are used in cases where impact on employees of harmful and (or) hazardous production factors cannot be avoided or limited by applying other measures, including collective protection products. Thus, the use of PPE is the last, and often the only possible barrier between the potential danger and an accident.

Taking into account the dependence of the level of injuries and the professional morbidity of workers from the proper maintenance of SIZ and their use, it is advisable to consider the ineffective use of PPE as a source of hazards at workplaces (Fig. 1) and include them in the number of expected hazards in assessing professional risks.

SIZ EFFICIENCY EVALUATION SCHEME

as a professional risk assessment element

┌───────────────┐

│ Danger │

└──┬───┬────────┘

│ │ ┌──────────────┐

│ └──\u003e │ risk │

│ └───┬──────────┘

│ │ ┌──────────────┐

│ └────\u003e │ Risk assessment │

│ └──────────────┘

│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌───────────────────┐

│ │ Evaluation │───────────────\u003e │ Risk Management

│────────\u003e │ efficiency│ └────────────────────┘

│ │ │ use│

│ │ │ SIZ │

\│/ │ └──────────────┘

┌──────────┴────┐

│ Use │.

└───────────────┘

From here there is a need to develop a methodology for assessing the effectiveness of the use of SIZ in workplaces as an element of professional risk assessment.

Within the framework of this article, under the assessment of the effectiveness of the use of PPE in the workplace, we will understand the expert assessment of the processes operating in the organization and measures aimed at using certified PPCs to prevent and (or) reduce the levels of impact on workers of harmful and (or) hazardous production factors.

Requirements for employees with personal protective equipment are determined by several regulatory legal documents.

In accordance with Art. 221 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation in works with harmful and (or) hazardous working conditions, as well as on the works performed in special temperature conditions or related to pollution, employees are issued certified personal protective equipment in accordance with the type standards that are established in the manner determined by the procedure The Government of the Russian Federation.

The employer is obliged to provide acquisition and issuance at the expense of specialized clothes, special shoes and other personal protective equipment to employees engaged in work with harmful and (or) hazardous working conditions, as well as on the works performed in special temperature conditions or contamination related ( Art. Art. 212 and 219 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation).

The issuance of special clothing workers, special shoes and other personal protective equipment is made in accordance with the standard standards of free issuance of special clothing, special shoes and other personal protective equipment to employees engaged in work with harmful and (or) hazardous working conditions, as well as on the work, Performed in special temperature conditions or related to pollution (hereinafter referred to as standard standards) approved by the orders of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation.

Mandatory requirements for the acquisition, issuance, application, storage and care for special clothing, special shoes and other means of individual protection establish inter-sectoral rules for providing employees with special clothing, special shoes and other personal protective equipment (hereinafter referred to as the Rules for SIZ), approved by the Order of the Ministry of Health and the social development of the Russian Federation of June 1, 2009 N 290n.

Based on the analysis of existing problems of ensuring and use the SIZ in the workplace in terms of reducing professional risk to the life and health of employees, we believe that the effectiveness of using PPE in workplaces depends largely on their proper choice and application. For example, in force in the Russian Federation, intersectoral rules for the provision of workers with special clothing, special shoes and other personal protective equipment are based on the principle of rationing. Such a principle does not guarantee the protection of an employee using PPE under existing working conditions at its workplace, since in the typical standards of free issuance of certified PPEs, the protective properties of the PPE are not taken into account (the characteristics of protective properties are not applied), which does not ensure the efficiency of the use of PPP issued in the workplace.

In this regard, in some organizations there is a discrepancy or incomplete compliance of the disabilities issued by the actual working conditions, which is due to the lack of a methodology for assessing the effectiveness of the use of PPE in the workplace, depending on the working conditions (on protective properties, according to the correctness of the choice of PPF, etc. ). Typical norms often cannot cover the specifics of each production. There may be additional harmful factors that are not taken into account in typical standards, but from which the employee needs to protect. Requires consideration of all factors available at this workplace.

In fig. 2 Presents the main stages of the SIZ life cycle: from the development before disposal.

Scheme of the Stages of Life Cycle Press

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐

│┌──────────┐ Production of PPM

││ development ├──┐ │

│└──────────┘ \│/ │

│ ┌────────────┐ │

│ │ Manufacturing │

│ └────────────┘│ │

└─────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌/│\─────────────\│/──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐

│ │ ┌─────────┐ Using PPE

│ ├─────\u003e │ Selection ├──┐ │

│ │ └──────────┘ \│/ │

│ │ ┌────────────┐ │

│ │ │ acquisition├─┐ │

│ │ └────────────┘\│/ │

│ │ ┌────────────┐ │

│ │ │ accounting ├─┐ │

│ │ └────────────┘\│/ │

│ │ ┌────────────┐ │

│ │ │ issuance ├─┐ │

│ │ └────────────┘\│/ │

│ │ ┌────────────┐ │

│ │ │ Evaluation ├───┐ │

│ │ │ Prostrates│ │ │

│ │ analysis └───────────┘ \\ │ / │

│ use ┌───────────────┐ │

│ <──────────────────────────┤Применение на РМ├──┐ │

│ └────────────────┘ │ │

└────────────────────────────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┘

┌───────────────────────────────────────────────\│/───────────────────────┐

│ ┌─────────────────┐ │

│ │ test ├──┐ │

│ └─────────────────┘ \│/ │

│ ┌─────────────────┐ │

│ │ repair and storage├────┐ │

│ └─────────────────┘ \│/ │

│ ┌──────────────────┐ │

│ Service SIZ │ Recycling │ │

│ └──────────────────┘ │

└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

In the full life cycle, the PPE can be conditionally allocated three next steps:

a) production PPE;

b) use of PPE;

c) SIZ service.

The use stage is the most important to consumers of PPE, it includes a choice, acquisition, accounting, issuing, assessing the security and application of PPE in the workplace. In the proposed method, two groups of indicators are introduced, which allow expertly, for example, when conducting job certification, evaluate the effectiveness of using PPE.

The first group of indicators reflects the procedure for choosing a PPE, the second group of indicators characterizes the use of PPE in the workplace.

The indicators of the first group, which characterizes the correctness of the choice of PPE, can be attributed:

a) an indicator that evaluates the compliance of the SIZ issued by the list of harmful and (or) hazardous production factors in the workplace;

b) An indicator that estimates the conformity of the protective properties of the workplace of the workplace issued by the worker in the workplace established for production factors. In case of certification of jobs, under the terms of labor, these indicators are defined as the excess of actual indicators, factors over hygienic standards. Accordingly, if there is an excess, the SIZ must have increased efficiency;

c) an indicator that evaluates the conformity of the protective properties of workers issued by workers with working conditions and the sectoral specifics of technological processes;

d) an indicator that evaluates the consumer properties of PPM issued, ease of use and compliance with individual sizes of the employee.

The indicators of the second group, which characterizes the use of PPE in the workplace, can be attributed:

a) An indicator that evaluates the conduct of employees to the rules for the use of SIZ on workplaces, taking into account the peculiarities of the technological process, the simplest ways to verify their performance, health care, as well as the implementation of training for the use of PPE. If the employee is not trained by the simplest ways of checking the health and performance of PPE, then the effectiveness of using PPE can noticeably decrease;

b) An indicator that demonstrates the dependence of injuries in cases of non-use of PPE. In the classifier of the causes of production injuries, there is an item - "injuries associated with the non-use of PPE." Accordingly, it is possible according to statistical data to evaluate the consequences of the non-separation of the SIZ - and in this profession, and in particular production, and in the industry;

c) an indicator that evaluates the satisfaction of the time of siest sesters issued by the employee, that period during which the manufacturer guarantees the preservation of the Protective Properties of the SIZ (taking into account the time of storage and care). Obviously, the higher the warranty period, the more qualitative to PPE;

d) An indicator that evaluates the presence of timely conduct of health checks (testing) PPE (mark, stamp, stamp, protocol, etc.), established by regulatory documents, as well as the recommendations of manufacturers of PPE.

The listed indicators are established in accordance with applicable regulatory legal acts that contain the requirements for PPE.

For each indicator, evaluation cards have been developed, including an indicator performed by checking, for example, when certifying jobs, the result of the inspection and the result of the evaluation of the indicator (positive or negative estimate). A positive assessment indicates that the processes and measures regarding the estimated indicator are carried out in the organization, provide prevention and (or) reduction of exposure levels on workers of harmful and (or) hazardous production factors.

We focus on the indicator that estimates the protective properties of the PPM to fit the class of working conditions. It means that the following: The greater the degree of harmfulness of working conditions - the greater the harmful factor exceeds hygienic standards - the higher the protective properties of PPE should be. It is necessary that the manufacturer in the passport indicate not only the absolute values \u200b\u200bof reducing the level of impact on the employee of a harmful and (or) hazardous factor, but also a certain category. It is necessary that a specialist choosing PPCs for the organization, according to the technical characteristics given in the Passport of PC, knew, with what class of working conditions (according to the specified factor), this PPE ensures protection, i.e., it provides a decrease in the actual level of factor to hygienic standards.

In tab. As an example of the assessment of the conformity of the workplace issued by the Claim in the workplace, the variation of the SIZ of respiratory organs is shown depending on the class of working conditions for the chemical factor.

Evaluation of Compliance with SIZ Breath Organs

class of working conditions

	Indicators, taken into account choice of Siz	Indicator, defining category Siz	Value indicator
Siz organs breathing filtering type	Substances, OT which provided protection; - Concentration substances; - coefficient protection; - coefficient penetration; - coefficient sucking; - Primary resistance air stream; - Protective time actions; - weight; - Features applications conditioned age users I. them physiognomic features (head size, geometric parameters face I. neck, presence beard, mustache, long hair points and defects persons, etc.)	Coefficient protection	Multiplicity reduction concentration harmful substances B. air working area equal to 2.
Multiplicity reduction concentration harmful substances B. air working area equal to 5.
Multiplicity reduction concentration harmful substances B. air working area equal to 10.
Multiplicity reduction concentration harmful substances B. air working area equal to 50 I. more

The indicator that estimates the satisfaction of the time of sink sesters by the employee guaranteed by the manufacturer of the preservation of protective properties of the SIZ at that concentration, which is declared in Passport SIZ. This is especially true for the protection of respiratory authorities.

In the EU there is a directive in the field of professional security and the health of workers' health 89.656.Eez, according to which the PPM socks should be determined based on the seriousness of the risk, the frequency of exposure to risk, the features of the workplace of each employee.

Thus, the above indicators on the results of their estimation may receive positive or negative estimates.

In general, the following rule is proposed for the effectiveness of the effectiveness of the use of PPE in the workplace, depending on the evaluations obtained:

a) Effective use of PPE in the workplace is recognized if all indicators receive positive assessments;

b) Ineffective use of PPE in the workplace is recognized if at least one of the indicators receive a negative assessment.

The application of the considered technique will help specialists responsible for the organization for the timely and in full issue of PPD employees, correctly decide on the choice and procurement of PPE.

The proposed methodology for assessing the effectiveness of the use of SIZ in the workplace may be useful for specialists of Rospotrebnadzor when making decisions on the decline in the degree of harmfulness of working conditions at a given workplace on the basis of an assessment of the effectiveness of PPM.

In accordance with paragraph 5.11.6 of the leadership of R 2.2.2006-05, in coordination with the territorial departments of the Federal Service for Supervision in the Sector of Consumer Rights Protection and Welfare (hereinafter referred to - Rospotrebnadzor), labor conditions can be assessed as less harmful (for one level, But not lower than class 3.1) in the following cases:

a) while reducing the contact time with harmful factors (time protection) in accordance with the recommendations given in the application 7 of the Guidelines or developed by specialists of the territorial bodies and agencies of the Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and the Welfare of Human, scientific or educational organizations of the hygienic profile;

b) when using effective (having a certificate of conformity) of personal protective equipment.

In the leadership of P 2.2.2006-05, it is true that SIZ should not simply meet the standards, but be effective. However, the problem is that "efficiency" in this document is deciphered as the presence of a certificate in the SIF. But in accordance with Art. Art. 212, 221 Labor Code of the Russian Federation (197-ФЗ) SIZ must have a certificate. If you follow the letter of the manual p 2.2.2006-05, it turns out that all organizations that fulfill the requirements that provided the issuance of certified PPE employees according to standard regulations automatically receive the right to lower the working class of working conditions for one level. Naturally, a decrease in class working class according to the requirements of Art. Art. 92, 117, 147 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation leads to changes in compensation to employees.

It is effective for this PPE effectively because it has a certificate (declaration) of conformity - incorrectly. If the employee issued certified PPEs according to the standard, this does not mean that effective protection is provided. Certificate - a document confirming that PPE has the properties that are declared in the passport. The certificate is issued by the certification authority on the basis of the Protocols submitted by the manufacturer of the Protocols on the tests carried out for compliance with the requirements of the technical regulations on the SIZ itself (for an employee who is wearing and for the environment), as well as protective properties.

Only when providing an employee with an effective (having a certificate of conformity) PPE, as well as to ensure effective use by the employee of this PPE in the workplace, you can achieve a guaranteed protected protection from affecting the harmful factor and lower its level of harmfulness.

Often the employer is difficult to find the answer to the question: what kind of PPC to purchase? There are expert recommendations for the choice of SIZ. But, first, such recommendations concern not all PPE. Secondly, while the employer is economically motivated only to comply with the standard standards for issuing PPE (for non-fulfillment, penalties and other penalties are imposed). No motivation to make an expert analysis of the effectiveness of SIZ, interested in the complaints of workers. In reality, the situation is distributed when SIZ for the organization is selected (purchased) according to the standards not experts of labor protection service, but supply. And they are guided primarily comparing prices on the market.

Currently, as part of the further modernization of labor-activated legislation, expert community develops the procedure for assessing professional risks and job certification. This project includes the procedure for assessing the effectiveness of the use of SIZ, evaluating the security of the employee to the means of individual protection against medium and high risks in the workplace. In particular, it is assumed that to reduce the class of working conditions to organizations (employers) will not be enough (as now) only to provide employees certified PPE according to regulations - it will be necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of these SIZ, conducting an appropriate assessment procedure.

The procedure for assessing the effectiveness of the use of SIZ as a professional risk assessment element should be carried out by a certified independent organization, namely the certificate organization.

When evaluating the provision of workplaces of workplaces in accordance with the new order of certification of jobs under the working conditions, approved by the order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia dated April 26, 2011 N 342N, an increase of the effectiveness of the employee issued by the Employee. At the same time, the effectiveness of the ESC personnel issued by the employee is confirmed by the fulfillment of the requirements of labor safety standards that determine the set of measures to ensure the effective use of SIZ in workplaces.

V.Ivanov

Leading Researcher,

lead auditor

Klin Institute for Security

and working conditions

Signed in print

Occupational protection, accident prevention

Keywords:

1 -1